Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Portability #363

Open
marc-white opened this issue Mar 6, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Portability #363

marc-white opened this issue Mar 6, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@marc-white
Copy link
Collaborator

An interesting question was raised by @charles-turner-1 this morning - how portable is access-nri-intake-catalog? For example, would another institute be able to pick it up and use it to manage/store their own collection of climate models without having to make structural changes to the code base? (As in, changes to the base-level code, not just adding Builders/Translators are required.)

What jumps out to me at first is:

  • I think most of the paths that are set inside the package are variables, so that should be able to be easily modified;
  • I think the code that deals with storage flags, storage access etc. is hard-coded to expect /g/data-style paths - that would need to change if we wanted to make the package more portable.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant