You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
The Ohm's law model page (https://warpx.readthedocs.io/en/latest/theory/models_algorithms/kinetic_fluid_hybrid_model.html) shows this:
$en_e\vec{E} = \frac{m}{e}\frac{\partial \vec{J}_e}{\partial t} + \frac{m}{e}\left( \vec{U}_e\cdot\nabla \right) \vec{J}_e - \nabla\cdot {\overleftrightarrow P}_e - \vec{J}_e\times\vec{B}+\vec{R}_e$
, while the ones I found in many places have no negative sign before the j cross B term.
In my simulation result, I also found the E = j_displacement cross B ($en_e\vec{E}=\vec{j_e}\times\vec{B}$ ) without a negative sign.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions