Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug Report] destinataires de messages aléatoires/ random message recipients #567

Open
HeleneLowinger opened this issue Sep 9, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
Bug Something isn't working

Comments

@HeleneLowinger
Copy link
Contributor

JTCAM, V Acary : "Les destinataires des messages de la plateforme sous souvent assez perturbant. Il semble etre un peu tiré au hasard. Il en est de même dans les messages récapitulatifs de la plateforme vers les auteurs."
// The recipients of the platform's messages are often quite confusing. It seems to be a bit random. The same applies to summary messages from the platform to the authors.

ex de message :

Dear Coordination Episciences iam,
The editor (XXXXX) of the article (#11269 - On the bifurcation analysis of thin multilayer structures by asymptotic numerical method) suggests to accept it.

"Coordination IAM" a le rôle d'admin, mais c'est le cas de 9 personnes chez JTCAM. (c'est bien Admin qui est coché pour recevoir les notifications).
Il semble curieux d'en choisir un au hasard (ou le premier de la liste par ordre alpha)...

@HeleneLowinger HeleneLowinger added Bug Something isn't working new New issue, pending triage labels Sep 9, 2024
@HeleneLowinger
Copy link
Contributor Author

ça se produit quand il n'y a pas un rédacteur assigné à l'article.
Solution : mettre tous en destinataire (pas en copie)

@cbarthonnat cbarthonnat removed the new New issue, pending triage label Oct 9, 2024
@cbarthonnat cbarthonnat moved this from Needs triage to Priority 2 in Episciences Issue Triage Oct 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Something isn't working
Projects
Status: Priority 2
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants