You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Has anyone been thinking about modifications to allow CRAM compatibility (i.e. CRAM output from the mapping pipeline, CRAM input to the transcript assembly and quantitation pipelines etc)?
Stripping sequencing from BAM files does result in a huge storage space gain, but on so many occasions it has turned out that we are actaully intrested in keeping the sequence - sequencing stripping is not lossless, because although the positions of the mismatches are stored, the actual mismatches themselves are not (mapper dependent).
Lossless CRAM is about 50% smaller than BAM, and for high depth runs, this is even true if you include the reference sequence in the CRAM file.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Has anyone been thinking about modifications to allow CRAM compatibility (i.e. CRAM output from the mapping pipeline, CRAM input to the transcript assembly and quantitation pipelines etc)?
Stripping sequencing from BAM files does result in a huge storage space gain, but on so many occasions it has turned out that we are actaully intrested in keeping the sequence - sequencing stripping is not lossless, because although the positions of the mismatches are stored, the actual mismatches themselves are not (mapper dependent).
Lossless CRAM is about 50% smaller than BAM, and for high depth runs, this is even true if you include the reference sequence in the CRAM file.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: