Skip to content

Commit 093e807

Browse files
jeremymanninggithub-actions[bot]
authored andcommitted
Auto-solve daily LeetCode problem using GPT-5-mini
1 parent 3686624 commit 093e807

File tree

1 file changed

+56
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+56
-0
lines changed

problems/2654/gpt5-mini.md

Lines changed: 56 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
1+
# [Problem 2654: Minimum Number of Operations to Make All Array Elements Equal to 1](https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-number-of-operations-to-make-all-array-elements-equal-to-1/description/?envType=daily-question)
2+
3+
## Initial thoughts (stream-of-consciousness)
4+
If any element is already 1, we can use it to make neighbors 1 by taking gcd(1, x) = 1, so we can "spread" the 1 across the array. Each non-1 element needs one operation to become 1 when there's at least one 1, so I think answer = n - (# of ones) in that case.
5+
6+
If there are no ones, we need to create a 1 first. Creating a 1 requires finding a contiguous subarray whose gcd is 1; reducing that subarray to a single 1 takes some operations. For a subarray of length L whose gcd is 1, I recall it takes L-1 operations to produce a 1 inside it (by repeatedly taking gcd of adjacent elements). Once we have a single 1, we then need to spread it to the remaining n-1 elements, which costs n-1 operations. So total would be (L-1) + (n-1) = n + L - 2. If no subarray has gcd 1, it's impossible.
7+
8+
So algorithm: count ones -> if any, return n - count_ones. Otherwise, find minimal L such that gcd of subarray = 1 (O(n^2) with gcd updates). If none -> -1. Else return n + L - 2.
9+
10+
## Refining the problem, round 2 thoughts
11+
- Edge cases:
12+
- Already contains multiple 1s -> formula n - count_ones still holds.
13+
- Entire array gcd > 1 -> impossible.
14+
- n up to 50, so O(n^2 logA) (gcd updates) is fine.
15+
- Implementation detail: while scanning subarrays, if running gcd becomes 1 we can break the inner loop for that start index because extending only increases length.
16+
- Complexity: We'll compute gcd pairwise cumulatively to avoid recomputing from scratch; use math.gcd.
17+
- No tricky memory requirements.
18+
19+
## Attempted solution(s)
20+
```python
21+
from math import gcd
22+
from typing import List
23+
24+
class Solution:
25+
def minOperations(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
26+
n = len(nums)
27+
# Count existing ones
28+
ones = sum(1 for x in nums if x == 1)
29+
if ones > 0:
30+
return n - ones
31+
32+
# Find minimal subarray length with gcd == 1
33+
min_len = float('inf')
34+
for i in range(n):
35+
g = nums[i]
36+
if g == 1:
37+
min_len = 1
38+
break
39+
for j in range(i + 1, n):
40+
g = gcd(g, nums[j])
41+
if g == 1:
42+
min_len = min(min_len, j - i + 1)
43+
break # no need to extend this start further
44+
45+
if min_len == float('inf'):
46+
return -1
47+
48+
# To create the first 1 takes (min_len - 1) operations,
49+
# then spreading that 1 to the remaining n-1 elements takes (n - 1) operations.
50+
return (min_len - 1) + (n - 1)
51+
```
52+
- Notes on approach:
53+
- If there is at least one 1 in nums, we need exactly one operation per non-1 to convert it to 1 using adjacent gcd with a 1, so answer = n - count_ones.
54+
- If no 1 exists, find the shortest contiguous segment whose gcd is 1 (length L). It takes L-1 operations to reduce that segment to a single 1, then n-1 operations to propagate that 1 to all elements. Total = n + L - 2.
55+
- Time complexity: O(n^2 * logA) where n = len(nums) (<=50) and logA is cost of gcd on values up to 1e6. Practically O(n^2).
56+
- Space complexity: O(1) extra space.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)