From 1c0e8613d070f6f858cf6597bafa4699a0e70010 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sacha Greif Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:04:45 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] add strings --- results.yml | 8 ++++---- state_of_js_2023.yml | 39 +++++++++------------------------------ 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) diff --git a/results.yml b/results.yml index 91dea66f1e7..7e7759f9adb 100644 --- a/results.yml +++ b/results.yml @@ -548,13 +548,13 @@ translations: This chart shows each technology's **retention ratio** over its total **user count**. It can be divided into four quadrants: - - **ASSESS**: Low usage, high retention. Technologies worth keeping an eye on. + - **1**: Low usage, high retention. Technologies worth keeping an eye on. - - **ADOPT**: High usage, high retention. Safe technologies to adopt. + - **2**: High usage, high retention. Safe technologies to adopt. - - **AVOID**: Low usage, low retention. Technologies probably best avoided currently. + - **3**: Low usage, low retention. Technologies that are harder to recommend currently. - - **ANALYZE**: High usage, low retention. Reassess these technologies if you're currently using them. + - **4**: High usage, low retention. Reassess these technologies if you're currently using them. # category other tools - key: blocks.category_other_tools diff --git a/state_of_js_2023.yml b/state_of_js_2023.yml index 192c492cfea..5698720d86d 100644 --- a/state_of_js_2023.yml +++ b/state_of_js_2023.yml @@ -7,9 +7,6 @@ translations: - key: general.results.description t: The 2023 edition of the annual survey about the latest trends in the JavaScript ecosystem. - - key: general.livestream_announcement - t: Make sure to tune in for our [special survey results livestream](https://dev.to/sachagreif/state-of-javascript-2021-livestream-24a5) on February 22! (English) - ########################################################################### # Introduction ########################################################################### @@ -81,30 +78,27 @@ translations: - key: sections.features.description t: | - JavaScript may move fast, but it seems like JavaScript developers move even faster, as many relatively new features already show high adoption levels. + This year we put special emphasis on identifying developer pain points with JavaScript. As one might expect, the **lack of native typing** and **browser inconsistencies** led their respective charts, each affecting nearly a third of developers. - - key: sections.technologies.description + - key: sections.libraries.description t: | - This year's results point to a high degree of fragmentation in the JavaScript world. But while this can sometimes cause headaches, all that competition does make for a very dynamic ecosystem. + We reworked our charts to highlight not just developer experience, but *sentiment*. Be sure to explore these new grouping and sorting options to figure out which libraries get the most love… or the least! - - key: sections.tools_others.description + - key: sections.other_tools.description t: | - Picking a technology can often come down to a series of tough choices between - competing priorities, and this year we tried to capture this process using a new bracket-style question format. + While the JavaScript conversation often seems to boild down to which framework to pick, it's worth remembering that there's a whole galaxy of other tools, services, and platforms to explore beyond that! - - key: sections.environments.description + - key: sections.usage.description t: | - Accessibility has long been an after-thought when it comes to web development, but many developers - are now realizing that it should in fact be the foundation on which everything else rests. + Once again it seems like TypeScript has established itself as the default, at least among survey respondents. But apart from that, JavaScript usage remains as varied as ever! - key: sections.resources.description t: | Rather than provide predefined lists of options for survey respondents to pick from, we decided to simply offer raw text fields. This led to quite a few new entrants in this year's Resources section! - - key: sections.opinions.description + - key: sections.awards.description t: | - Whether it's pain points that hold you back today, or missing features that you hope to use - tomorrow, this was your chance to vent and share your gripes with JavaScript! + This year's awards were dominated by one very specific project… how quickly will you guess what it is? ########################################################################### # Charts @@ -117,19 +111,6 @@ translations: - key: options.features_categories.other_features aliasFor: sections.other_features.title - - key: blocks.tools_quadrant.description - t: | - This chart shows each technology's **retention ratio** over its total **user count**. - It can be divided into four quadrants: - - - **1**: Low usage, high retention. Technologies worth keeping an eye on. - - - **2**: High usage, high retention. Safe technologies to adopt. - - - **3**: Low usage, low retention. Technologies that are harder to recommend currently. - - - **4**: High usage, low retention. Reassess these technologies if you're currently using them. - ########################################################################### # Notes ########################################################################### @@ -382,8 +363,6 @@ translations: t: Advance your skills with in-depth, modern front-end engineering courses. - key: sponsors.google_chrome.description t: Thanks to the Google Chrome team for supporting our work. - - key: sponsors.renderatl.description - t: This is a tech conference focused on Front-End Engineering. ########################################################################### # FAQ/About