Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

spergel profiles are much slower than galsim #123

Open
3 tasks
beckermr opened this issue Dec 10, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
3 tasks

spergel profiles are much slower than galsim #123

beckermr opened this issue Dec 10, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@beckermr
Copy link
Collaborator

I've heard reports that the spergel profiles are much slower than galsim.

To Do:

  • add benchmark comparison to galsim
  • profile to find optimizations
  • implement those optimizations
@ismael-mendoza
Copy link
Collaborator

quick note, when I checked it was a sum of Exponential and Spergel profile (nu=-0.6) -- might be worth taking a look at the timing of each of these separately, but my guess is that it's very likely coming from the Spergel...

@beckermr
Copy link
Collaborator Author

beckermr commented Jan 7, 2025

We've determined that this is from the conversion of half light radius to scale radius. So we're going to focus our optimization on those bits of the code.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants