Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

it seems Unet in your code can outperform CE_Net in my training #15

Open
Dongshengjiang opened this issue Jan 11, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@Dongshengjiang
Copy link

it seems Unet in your code can outperform CE_Net in my training. I directly used your code and retrained the Unet, I got a accuracy of [acc: 0.956 | sen: 0.844 | auc:0.98]. This should better than the results of CE_Net. could you please share you weights?

@Fuzesunshine
Copy link

Fuzesunshine commented Aug 10, 2020

I got similar result [sen: 0.8607 | acc:0.9574 | auc:0.9829] of U-Net, which is better than CE-Net.

@bai101315
Copy link

你好,我使用了test_center.py文件,但是最后的的结果sen一直为0,而且最后得到的mask只有全黑的,你能帮帮我吗?非常感谢,非常感谢

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants