Skip to content

Conversation

@fpigeonjr
Copy link
Contributor

@fpigeonjr fpigeonjr commented Aug 29, 2025

but will need more BE support based on
#4280 (comment)

What changed

Described what changes in this PR, at a high level

Issue

How to test

Write out steps for how someone could test this PR against the acceptance criteria

Screenshots

If relevant, e.g. for a front-end feature

Definition of Done Checklist

  • OESA: Code refactored for clarity
  • OESA: Dependency rules followed
  • Automated unit tests updated and passed
  • Automated integration tests updated and passed
  • Automated quality tests updated and passed
  • Automated load tests updated and passed
  • Automated a11y tests updated and passed
  • Automated security tests updated and passed
  • 90%+ Code coverage achieved
  • Form validations updated

Links

If relevant, e.g. for a link to a piece of markdown documentation

but will need more BE support based on
#4280 (comment)
@fpigeonjr fpigeonjr self-assigned this Aug 29, 2025
@fpigeonjr fpigeonjr changed the title refactor: use change request attribute refactor: use has_proc_shop_change attribute Aug 29, 2025
@fpigeonjr fpigeonjr added the Blocked More information, decisions, or actions by an external party are needed by to continue label Sep 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Blocked More information, decisions, or actions by an external party are needed by to continue

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

UI: update proc_shop change requests to use the new prop from api

2 participants