You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
English Version (Versione italiana fornita di seguito)
Indicate which part of the project the bug concerns: ontology, knowledge graph, rdfizer
ontology a-cd:
Describe the bug
The object property hasCreationLocation has range CulturalEntity. Why? Shouldn't it be anything that is a l0:Location? I think this applies also to other similar relations. I notice also that this property (as well as others) is subproperty of hasRelatedWorlk, from which inherits this range axiom. The assumption is that whatever the type of location it must be a CulturalEntity? I don't see this plausible nor intuitive. Also, hasRelatedWork says "This property relates a cultural property to a related work (e.g. copy, preparatory work)." Are we constraining the "hasCreationLocation" and the other similar properties to only locations that is a work of art, as well? It may happen that a CP is found in a place that is not a "work of art" nor a cultural entity, or that it is stored in a private place for example, because it belongs to a private collector.
To Reproduce
no behaviour to reproduce but a ill-modeling in the ontology (a-cd: module)
Expected behavior
the relation hasCreationLocation should have l0:Location as range
the same applies to other similar relations, hence I recommend a review of them Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
English Version (Versione italiana fornita di seguito)
Indicate which part of the project the bug concerns: ontology, knowledge graph, rdfizer
ontology a-cd:
Describe the bug
The object property hasCreationLocation has range CulturalEntity. Why? Shouldn't it be anything that is a l0:Location? I think this applies also to other similar relations. I notice also that this property (as well as others) is subproperty of hasRelatedWorlk, from which inherits this range axiom. The assumption is that whatever the type of location it must be a CulturalEntity? I don't see this plausible nor intuitive. Also, hasRelatedWork says "This property relates a cultural property to a related work (e.g. copy, preparatory work)." Are we constraining the "hasCreationLocation" and the other similar properties to only locations that is a work of art, as well? It may happen that a CP is found in a place that is not a "work of art" nor a cultural entity, or that it is stored in a private place for example, because it belongs to a private collector.
To Reproduce
no behaviour to reproduce but a ill-modeling in the ontology (a-cd: module)
Expected behavior
the relation hasCreationLocation should have l0:Location as range
the same applies to other similar relations, hence I recommend a review of them
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: