We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
V2 supports both disperser/client side commitment generation. I.e a user can either:
Currently for 2, there's a bug with referencing G2 when generating a kzg length commitment:
5125ms role=eigenda_proxy INFO [01-31|00:26:42.409] Reading G2 points (33554432 bytes) takes 6.355542ms role=eigenda_proxy INFO [01-31|00:26:42.409] Unmarshalling error: invalid fp.Element encoding role=eigenda_proxy INFO [01-31|00:26:42.409] Unmarshalling error: invalid fp.Element encoding role=eigenda_proxy INFO [01-31|00:26:42.409] Unmarshalling error: invalid fp.Element encoding role=eigenda_proxy INFO [01-31|00:26:42.409] Unmarshalling error: invalid fp.Element encoding role=eigenda_proxy CRIT [01-31|00:26:42.409] Application failed role=eigenda_proxy message="failed to create store: failed to create verifier: failed to create kzg verifier: failed to read 524288 G2 points from resources/g2.point: invalid fp.Element encoding"
I've fed necessary SRS context but this seems to be specific to how the eigenda parameterized prover works.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
V2 supports both disperser/client side commitment generation. I.e a user can either:
Currently for 2, there's a bug with referencing G2 when generating a kzg length commitment:
I've fed necessary SRS context but this seems to be specific to how the eigenda parameterized prover works.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: