|
1 |
| -// SPDX-License-Identifier: BUSL-1.1 |
2 |
| -pragma solidity ^0.8.27; |
3 |
| - |
4 |
| -import "src/test/integration/tests/upgrade/UpgradeTest.t.sol"; |
5 |
| - |
6 |
| -contract Integration_Upgrade_EigenPod_Base is UpgradeTest { |
7 |
| - uint[] shares; |
8 |
| - |
9 |
| - function _init() internal virtual override { |
10 |
| - _configAssetTypes(HOLDS_ETH); |
11 |
| - _configUserTypes(DEFAULT); |
12 |
| - |
13 |
| - /// 0. Create a staker with underlying assets |
14 |
| - (staker, strategies, initTokenBalances) = _newRandomStaker(); |
15 |
| - shares = _calculateExpectedShares(strategies, initTokenBalances); |
16 |
| - |
17 |
| - /// 1. Deposit into strategies |
18 |
| - staker.depositIntoEigenlayer(strategies, initTokenBalances); |
19 |
| - } |
20 |
| -} |
21 |
| - |
22 |
| -contract Integration_Upgrade_EigenPod_SlashAfterUpgrade is Integration_Upgrade_EigenPod_Base { |
23 |
| - function testFuzz_deposit_upgrade_slash_completeCheckpoint(uint24) public { |
24 |
| - uint64 initBeaconBalanceGwei = uint64(initTokenBalances[0] / GWEI_TO_WEI); |
25 |
| - |
26 |
| - /// 2. Upgrade contracts |
27 |
| - _upgradeEigenLayerContracts(); |
28 |
| - |
29 |
| - /// 3. Slash the staker partially |
30 |
| - validators = staker.getActiveValidators(); |
31 |
| - slashedGwei = beaconChain.slashValidators(validators, BeaconChainMock.SlashType.Minor); |
32 |
| - beaconChain.advanceEpoch_NoRewards(); // Withdraw slashed validators to pod |
33 |
| - |
34 |
| - // 4. Start and complete a checkpoint |
35 |
| - staker.startCheckpoint(); |
36 |
| - check_StartCheckpoint_WithPodBalance_State(staker, initBeaconBalanceGwei - slashedGwei); |
37 |
| - staker.completeCheckpoint(); |
38 |
| - check_CompleteCheckpoint_WithSlashing_HandleRoundDown_State(staker, validators, slashedGwei); |
39 |
| - } |
40 |
| -} |
41 |
| - |
42 |
| -contract Integration_Upgrade_EigenPod_FullSlash is Integration_Upgrade_EigenPod_Base { |
43 |
| - function _init() internal override { |
44 |
| - super._init(); |
45 |
| - |
46 |
| - /// 2. Fully slash the staker |
47 |
| - validators = staker.getActiveValidators(); |
48 |
| - slashedGwei = beaconChain.slashValidators(validators, BeaconChainMock.SlashType.Full); |
49 |
| - beaconChain.advanceEpoch_NoRewards(); // Withdraw slashed validators to pod |
50 |
| - |
51 |
| - /// 3. Upgrade contracts |
52 |
| - _upgradeEigenLayerContracts(); |
53 |
| - } |
54 |
| - |
55 |
| - function testFuzz_deposit_fullSlash_upgrade_delegate(uint24) public { |
56 |
| - /// 4. Delegate to operator |
57 |
| - operator = _newRandomOperator(); |
58 |
| - staker.delegateTo(operator); |
59 |
| - check_Delegation_State(staker, operator, strategies, shares); |
60 |
| - } |
61 |
| - |
62 |
| - function testFuzz_deposit_fullSlash_upgrade_deposit_delegate(uint24) public { |
63 |
| - // 5. Start a new validator & verify withdrawal credentials |
64 |
| - cheats.deal(address(staker), 32 ether); |
65 |
| - initTokenBalances[0] = initTokenBalances[0] + 32 ether; |
66 |
| - (uint40[] memory newValidators, uint64 addedBeaconBalanceGwei,) = staker.startValidators(); |
67 |
| - beaconChain.advanceEpoch_NoRewards(); |
68 |
| - staker.verifyWithdrawalCredentials(newValidators); |
69 |
| - check_VerifyWC_State(staker, newValidators, addedBeaconBalanceGwei); |
70 |
| - shares = _calculateExpectedShares(strategies, initTokenBalances); |
71 |
| - |
72 |
| - // 6. Delegate to operator |
73 |
| - operator = _newRandomOperator(); |
74 |
| - staker.delegateTo(operator); |
75 |
| - check_Delegation_State(staker, operator, strategies, shares); |
76 |
| - } |
77 |
| -} |
78 |
| - |
79 |
| -contract Integration_Upgrade_EigenPod_NegativeShares is Integration_Upgrade_EigenPod_Base { |
80 |
| - int[] tokenDeltas; |
81 |
| - int[] balanceUpdateShareDelta; |
82 |
| - Withdrawal withdrawal; |
83 |
| - |
84 |
| - function _init() internal override { |
85 |
| - super._init(); |
86 |
| - |
87 |
| - // 3. Delegate to operator |
88 |
| - operator = _newRandomOperator(); |
89 |
| - staker.delegateTo(operator); |
90 |
| - |
91 |
| - /// 4. Queue a withdrawal for all shares |
92 |
| - Withdrawal[] memory withdrawals = staker.queueWithdrawals(strategies, shares); |
93 |
| - withdrawal = withdrawals[0]; |
94 |
| - |
95 |
| - /// 5. Update balance randomly (can be positive or negative) |
96 |
| - (tokenDeltas, balanceUpdateShareDelta,) = _randBalanceUpdate(staker, strategies); |
97 |
| - staker.updateBalances(strategies, tokenDeltas); |
98 |
| - |
99 |
| - /// 6. Upgrade contracts |
100 |
| - _upgradeEigenLayerContracts(); |
101 |
| - } |
102 |
| - |
103 |
| - function testFuzz_deposit_delegate_updateBalance_upgrade_completeAsShares(uint24) public { |
104 |
| - /// 7. Complete the withdrawal as shares |
105 |
| - Withdrawal[] memory withdrawals = new Withdrawal[](1); |
106 |
| - withdrawals[0] = withdrawal; |
107 |
| - _rollBlocksForCompleteWithdrawals(withdrawals); |
108 |
| - staker.completeWithdrawalAsShares(withdrawal); |
109 |
| - |
110 |
| - // Manually complete checks since we could still negative shares prior to the upgrade, causing a revert in the share check |
111 |
| - (uint[] memory expectedOperatorShareDelta, int[] memory expectedStakerShareDelta) = |
112 |
| - _getPostWithdrawalExpectedShareDeltas(balanceUpdateShareDelta[0], withdrawal); |
113 |
| - assert_WithdrawalNotPending(delegationManager.calculateWithdrawalRoot(withdrawal), "staker withdrawal should no longer be pending"); |
114 |
| - assert_Snap_Unchanged_TokenBalances(staker, "staker should not have any change in underlying token balances"); |
115 |
| - assert_Snap_Added_OperatorShares( |
116 |
| - operator, withdrawal.strategies, expectedOperatorShareDelta, "operator should have received shares" |
117 |
| - ); |
118 |
| - assert_Snap_Delta_StakerShares(staker, strategies, expectedStakerShareDelta, "staker should have received expected shares"); |
119 |
| - } |
120 |
| - |
121 |
| - function testFuzz_deposit_delegate_updateBalance_upgrade_completeAsTokens(uint24) public { |
122 |
| - /// 7. Complete the withdrawal as tokens |
123 |
| - Withdrawal[] memory withdrawals = new Withdrawal[](1); |
124 |
| - withdrawals[0] = withdrawal; |
125 |
| - _rollBlocksForCompleteWithdrawals(withdrawals); |
126 |
| - IERC20[] memory tokens = staker.completeWithdrawalAsTokens(withdrawal); |
127 |
| - uint[] memory expectedTokens = _getPostWithdrawalExpectedTokenDeltas(balanceUpdateShareDelta[0], withdrawal); |
128 |
| - |
129 |
| - // Manually complete checks since we could still negative shares prior to the upgrade, causing a revert in the share check |
130 |
| - assert_WithdrawalNotPending(delegationManager.calculateWithdrawalRoot(withdrawal), "staker withdrawal should no longer be pending"); |
131 |
| - assert_Snap_Added_TokenBalances(staker, tokens, expectedTokens, "staker should have received expected tokens"); |
132 |
| - assert_Snap_Unchanged_OperatorShares(operator, "operator shares should not have changed"); |
133 |
| - |
134 |
| - // If we had a positive balance update, then the staker shares should not have changed |
135 |
| - if (balanceUpdateShareDelta[0] > 0) { |
136 |
| - assert_Snap_Unchanged_Staker_DepositShares(staker, "staker shares should not have changed"); |
137 |
| - } |
138 |
| - // Else, the staker shares should have increased by the magnitude of the negative share delta |
139 |
| - else { |
140 |
| - int[] memory expectedStakerShareDelta = new int[](1); |
141 |
| - expectedStakerShareDelta[0] = -balanceUpdateShareDelta[0]; |
142 |
| - assert_Snap_Delta_StakerShares(staker, strategies, expectedStakerShareDelta, "staker should have received expected shares"); |
143 |
| - } |
144 |
| - } |
145 |
| - |
146 |
| - function _getPostWithdrawalExpectedShareDeltas(int _balanceUpdateShareDelta, Withdrawal memory _withdrawal) |
147 |
| - internal |
148 |
| - pure |
149 |
| - returns (uint[] memory, int[] memory) |
150 |
| - { |
151 |
| - uint[] memory operatorShareDelta = new uint[](1); |
152 |
| - int[] memory stakerShareDelta = new int[](1); |
153 |
| - // The staker share delta is the withdrawal scaled shares since it can go from negative to positive |
154 |
| - stakerShareDelta[0] = int(_withdrawal.scaledShares[0]); |
155 |
| - |
156 |
| - if (_balanceUpdateShareDelta > 0) { |
157 |
| - // If balanceUpdateShareDelta is positive, then the operator delta is the withdrawal scaled shares |
158 |
| - operatorShareDelta[0] = _withdrawal.scaledShares[0]; |
159 |
| - } else { |
160 |
| - // Operator shares never went negative, so we can just add the withdrawal scaled shares and the negative share delta |
161 |
| - operatorShareDelta[0] = uint(int(_withdrawal.scaledShares[0]) + _balanceUpdateShareDelta); |
162 |
| - } |
163 |
| - |
164 |
| - return (operatorShareDelta, stakerShareDelta); |
165 |
| - } |
166 |
| - |
167 |
| - function _getPostWithdrawalExpectedTokenDeltas(int _balanceUpdateShareDelta, Withdrawal memory _withdrawal) |
168 |
| - internal |
169 |
| - pure |
170 |
| - returns (uint[] memory) |
171 |
| - { |
172 |
| - uint[] memory expectedTokenDeltas = new uint[](1); |
173 |
| - if (_balanceUpdateShareDelta > 0) { |
174 |
| - // If we had a positive balance update, then the expected token delta is the withdrawal scaled shares |
175 |
| - expectedTokenDeltas[0] = _withdrawal.scaledShares[0]; |
176 |
| - } else { |
177 |
| - // If we had a negative balance update, then the expected token delta is the withdrawal scaled shares plus the negative share delta |
178 |
| - expectedTokenDeltas[0] = uint(int(_withdrawal.scaledShares[0]) + _balanceUpdateShareDelta); |
179 |
| - } |
180 |
| - return expectedTokenDeltas; |
181 |
| - } |
182 |
| -} |
| 1 | +// // SPDX-License-Identifier: BUSL-1.1 |
| 2 | +// pragma solidity ^0.8.27; |
| 3 | + |
| 4 | +// import "src/test/integration/tests/upgrade/UpgradeTest.t.sol"; |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | +// contract Integration_Upgrade_EigenPod_Base is UpgradeTest { |
| 7 | +// uint[] shares; |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +// function _init() internal virtual override { |
| 10 | +// _configAssetTypes(HOLDS_ETH); |
| 11 | +// _configUserTypes(DEFAULT); |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +// /// 0. Create a staker with underlying assets |
| 14 | +// (staker, strategies, initTokenBalances) = _newRandomStaker(); |
| 15 | +// shares = _calculateExpectedShares(strategies, initTokenBalances); |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +// /// 1. Deposit into strategies |
| 18 | +// staker.depositIntoEigenlayer(strategies, initTokenBalances); |
| 19 | +// } |
| 20 | +// } |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +// contract Integration_Upgrade_EigenPod_SlashAfterUpgrade is Integration_Upgrade_EigenPod_Base { |
| 23 | +// function testFuzz_deposit_upgrade_slash_completeCheckpoint(uint24) public { |
| 24 | +// uint64 initBeaconBalanceGwei = uint64(initTokenBalances[0] / GWEI_TO_WEI); |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +// /// 2. Upgrade contracts |
| 27 | +// _upgradeEigenLayerContracts(); |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +// /// 3. Slash the staker partially |
| 30 | +// validators = staker.getActiveValidators(); |
| 31 | +// slashedGwei = beaconChain.slashValidators(validators, BeaconChainMock.SlashType.Minor); |
| 32 | +// beaconChain.advanceEpoch_NoRewards(); // Withdraw slashed validators to pod |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +// // 4. Start and complete a checkpoint |
| 35 | +// staker.startCheckpoint(); |
| 36 | +// check_StartCheckpoint_WithPodBalance_State(staker, initBeaconBalanceGwei - slashedGwei); |
| 37 | +// staker.completeCheckpoint(); |
| 38 | +// check_CompleteCheckpoint_WithSlashing_HandleRoundDown_State(staker, validators, slashedGwei); |
| 39 | +// } |
| 40 | +// } |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +// contract Integration_Upgrade_EigenPod_FullSlash is Integration_Upgrade_EigenPod_Base { |
| 43 | +// function _init() internal override { |
| 44 | +// super._init(); |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +// /// 2. Fully slash the staker |
| 47 | +// validators = staker.getActiveValidators(); |
| 48 | +// slashedGwei = beaconChain.slashValidators(validators, BeaconChainMock.SlashType.Full); |
| 49 | +// beaconChain.advanceEpoch_NoRewards(); // Withdraw slashed validators to pod |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +// /// 3. Upgrade contracts |
| 52 | +// _upgradeEigenLayerContracts(); |
| 53 | +// } |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +// function testFuzz_deposit_fullSlash_upgrade_delegate(uint24) public { |
| 56 | +// /// 4. Delegate to operator |
| 57 | +// operator = _newRandomOperator(); |
| 58 | +// staker.delegateTo(operator); |
| 59 | +// check_Delegation_State(staker, operator, strategies, shares); |
| 60 | +// } |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +// function testFuzz_deposit_fullSlash_upgrade_deposit_delegate(uint24) public { |
| 63 | +// // 5. Start a new validator & verify withdrawal credentials |
| 64 | +// cheats.deal(address(staker), 32 ether); |
| 65 | +// initTokenBalances[0] = initTokenBalances[0] + 32 ether; |
| 66 | +// (uint40[] memory newValidators, uint64 addedBeaconBalanceGwei,) = staker.startValidators(); |
| 67 | +// beaconChain.advanceEpoch_NoRewards(); |
| 68 | +// staker.verifyWithdrawalCredentials(newValidators); |
| 69 | +// check_VerifyWC_State(staker, newValidators, addedBeaconBalanceGwei); |
| 70 | +// shares = _calculateExpectedShares(strategies, initTokenBalances); |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +// // 6. Delegate to operator |
| 73 | +// operator = _newRandomOperator(); |
| 74 | +// staker.delegateTo(operator); |
| 75 | +// check_Delegation_State(staker, operator, strategies, shares); |
| 76 | +// } |
| 77 | +// } |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | +// contract Integration_Upgrade_EigenPod_NegativeShares is Integration_Upgrade_EigenPod_Base { |
| 80 | +// int[] tokenDeltas; |
| 81 | +// int[] balanceUpdateShareDelta; |
| 82 | +// Withdrawal withdrawal; |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +// function _init() internal override { |
| 85 | +// super._init(); |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | +// // 3. Delegate to operator |
| 88 | +// operator = _newRandomOperator(); |
| 89 | +// staker.delegateTo(operator); |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +// /// 4. Queue a withdrawal for all shares |
| 92 | +// Withdrawal[] memory withdrawals = staker.queueWithdrawals(strategies, shares); |
| 93 | +// withdrawal = withdrawals[0]; |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | +// /// 5. Update balance randomly (can be positive or negative) |
| 96 | +// (tokenDeltas, balanceUpdateShareDelta,) = _randBalanceUpdate(staker, strategies); |
| 97 | +// staker.updateBalances(strategies, tokenDeltas); |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | +// /// 6. Upgrade contracts |
| 100 | +// _upgradeEigenLayerContracts(); |
| 101 | +// } |
| 102 | + |
| 103 | +// function testFuzz_deposit_delegate_updateBalance_upgrade_completeAsShares(uint24) public { |
| 104 | +// /// 7. Complete the withdrawal as shares |
| 105 | +// Withdrawal[] memory withdrawals = new Withdrawal[](1); |
| 106 | +// withdrawals[0] = withdrawal; |
| 107 | +// _rollBlocksForCompleteWithdrawals(withdrawals); |
| 108 | +// staker.completeWithdrawalAsShares(withdrawal); |
| 109 | + |
| 110 | +// // Manually complete checks since we could still negative shares prior to the upgrade, causing a revert in the share check |
| 111 | +// (uint[] memory expectedOperatorShareDelta, int[] memory expectedStakerShareDelta) = |
| 112 | +// _getPostWithdrawalExpectedShareDeltas(balanceUpdateShareDelta[0], withdrawal); |
| 113 | +// assert_WithdrawalNotPending(delegationManager.calculateWithdrawalRoot(withdrawal), "staker withdrawal should no longer be pending"); |
| 114 | +// assert_Snap_Unchanged_TokenBalances(staker, "staker should not have any change in underlying token balances"); |
| 115 | +// assert_Snap_Added_OperatorShares( |
| 116 | +// operator, withdrawal.strategies, expectedOperatorShareDelta, "operator should have received shares" |
| 117 | +// ); |
| 118 | +// assert_Snap_Delta_StakerShares(staker, strategies, expectedStakerShareDelta, "staker should have received expected shares"); |
| 119 | +// } |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | +// function testFuzz_deposit_delegate_updateBalance_upgrade_completeAsTokens(uint24) public { |
| 122 | +// /// 7. Complete the withdrawal as tokens |
| 123 | +// Withdrawal[] memory withdrawals = new Withdrawal[](1); |
| 124 | +// withdrawals[0] = withdrawal; |
| 125 | +// _rollBlocksForCompleteWithdrawals(withdrawals); |
| 126 | +// IERC20[] memory tokens = staker.completeWithdrawalAsTokens(withdrawal); |
| 127 | +// uint[] memory expectedTokens = _getPostWithdrawalExpectedTokenDeltas(balanceUpdateShareDelta[0], withdrawal); |
| 128 | + |
| 129 | +// // Manually complete checks since we could still negative shares prior to the upgrade, causing a revert in the share check |
| 130 | +// assert_WithdrawalNotPending(delegationManager.calculateWithdrawalRoot(withdrawal), "staker withdrawal should no longer be pending"); |
| 131 | +// assert_Snap_Added_TokenBalances(staker, tokens, expectedTokens, "staker should have received expected tokens"); |
| 132 | +// assert_Snap_Unchanged_OperatorShares(operator, "operator shares should not have changed"); |
| 133 | + |
| 134 | +// // If we had a positive balance update, then the staker shares should not have changed |
| 135 | +// if (balanceUpdateShareDelta[0] > 0) { |
| 136 | +// assert_Snap_Unchanged_Staker_DepositShares(staker, "staker shares should not have changed"); |
| 137 | +// } |
| 138 | +// // Else, the staker shares should have increased by the magnitude of the negative share delta |
| 139 | +// else { |
| 140 | +// int[] memory expectedStakerShareDelta = new int[](1); |
| 141 | +// expectedStakerShareDelta[0] = -balanceUpdateShareDelta[0]; |
| 142 | +// assert_Snap_Delta_StakerShares(staker, strategies, expectedStakerShareDelta, "staker should have received expected shares"); |
| 143 | +// } |
| 144 | +// } |
| 145 | + |
| 146 | +// function _getPostWithdrawalExpectedShareDeltas(int _balanceUpdateShareDelta, Withdrawal memory _withdrawal) |
| 147 | +// internal |
| 148 | +// pure |
| 149 | +// returns (uint[] memory, int[] memory) |
| 150 | +// { |
| 151 | +// uint[] memory operatorShareDelta = new uint[](1); |
| 152 | +// int[] memory stakerShareDelta = new int[](1); |
| 153 | +// // The staker share delta is the withdrawal scaled shares since it can go from negative to positive |
| 154 | +// stakerShareDelta[0] = int(_withdrawal.scaledShares[0]); |
| 155 | + |
| 156 | +// if (_balanceUpdateShareDelta > 0) { |
| 157 | +// // If balanceUpdateShareDelta is positive, then the operator delta is the withdrawal scaled shares |
| 158 | +// operatorShareDelta[0] = _withdrawal.scaledShares[0]; |
| 159 | +// } else { |
| 160 | +// // Operator shares never went negative, so we can just add the withdrawal scaled shares and the negative share delta |
| 161 | +// operatorShareDelta[0] = uint(int(_withdrawal.scaledShares[0]) + _balanceUpdateShareDelta); |
| 162 | +// } |
| 163 | + |
| 164 | +// return (operatorShareDelta, stakerShareDelta); |
| 165 | +// } |
| 166 | + |
| 167 | +// function _getPostWithdrawalExpectedTokenDeltas(int _balanceUpdateShareDelta, Withdrawal memory _withdrawal) |
| 168 | +// internal |
| 169 | +// pure |
| 170 | +// returns (uint[] memory) |
| 171 | +// { |
| 172 | +// uint[] memory expectedTokenDeltas = new uint[](1); |
| 173 | +// if (_balanceUpdateShareDelta > 0) { |
| 174 | +// // If we had a positive balance update, then the expected token delta is the withdrawal scaled shares |
| 175 | +// expectedTokenDeltas[0] = _withdrawal.scaledShares[0]; |
| 176 | +// } else { |
| 177 | +// // If we had a negative balance update, then the expected token delta is the withdrawal scaled shares plus the negative share delta |
| 178 | +// expectedTokenDeltas[0] = uint(int(_withdrawal.scaledShares[0]) + _balanceUpdateShareDelta); |
| 179 | +// } |
| 180 | +// return expectedTokenDeltas; |
| 181 | +// } |
| 182 | +// } |
0 commit comments