TODO:
The fhl codes were downloaded from nose (3.4.2020). Missing codes, translations and validity dates were manually colledted from kela’s web page into table ./1_source_vocabulary/Kela_fhlursement_codes.xlsx by @CoderMikolaj.
Resulting table contains the codes, names, and validity periods. Some codes (e.g 307) have a different names during different periods, and therefore codes are repeated on the table for name and time period.
TODO: we got the name changes over time only for the top 21 codes. The rest should be checked. (top 21 bcs were the ones with no name at all kela’s )
Missing English translations were made using Google-tralator
| tmp_name_en_source | n |
|---|---|
| 1639 |
Source table with added translation has been formatted to be similar to OMOP in 1_source_vocabulary/fhl_for_source_vocabulary.csv.
From 1 639 codes 0 have been approved.
This makes 0% of codes approved.
How many codes labeled as FHL in finngen are not in the atc standard?
There are 10 codes not found in the standard
Top10 sorted by freq:
| concept_code | freq | freq_per |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 366 | 0.210% |
| ____ | 170 | 0.098% |
| 6823 | 34 | 0.020% |
| 7215 | 33 | 0.019% |
| 6469 | 16 | 0.009% |
| 6903 | 16 | 0.009% |
| 9744 | 16 | 0.009% |
| 0000 | 9 | 0.005% |
| 1392 | 9 | 0.005% |
| 120 | 8 | 0.005% |
The full list can be found in ./3_freq_of_source_codes/finngen_not_in_FHL.csv
Status of the FHL codes infinngen
| status | n_codes | per_codes | n_events | per_events |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| not_mapped | 955 | 98.964% | 173482 | 99.611% |
| not_found | 10 | 1.036% | 677 | 0.389% |