Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reproducible performance #5

Open
gitboy16 opened this issue Dec 7, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Reproducible performance #5

gitboy16 opened this issue Dec 7, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@gitboy16
Copy link

gitboy16 commented Dec 7, 2022

Hi,

The way you benchmark the sorting algorithms obviously depends on the hardware you are using.
From a previous issue I opened you can see that depending on the hardware Julia is not the fastest, nor the most memory efficient solution.

I don't have a solution to that but it would be great to find a way for people to be able to reproduce the perfomance that you are displaying.

I was wondering if it is possible to run these benchmarks on a github server or equivalent enviornnment where people can actually reproduce things.

Thank you
Kind regards

@LilithHafner
Copy link
Owner

Unfortunately, I do not have the bandwidth to configure 8 different languages on a remote server. Feel free to submit a PR, though!

@dumblob
Copy link

dumblob commented Jun 21, 2023

I think it would be enough to get rid of numeric sorting and suddenly the performance should be much more reproducible if not "always everywhere".

See #11 .

@LilithHafner
Copy link
Owner

Reproducibility is separate from having a diverse set of benchmarks—though both are important and lacking here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants