Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AFAIK, the CryptoManiac/Ed25519 is not affected #25

Open
CryptoManiac opened this issue Mar 5, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

AFAIK, the CryptoManiac/Ed25519 is not affected #25

CryptoManiac opened this issue Mar 5, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@CryptoManiac
Copy link

CryptoManiac commented Mar 5, 2024

I believe there is a mistake. The referenced function has nothing to do with the message signing code. Neither the publicly available message signing method Ed25519.Sign nor its internal twin are expecting the public key among their arguments.

P.S. I find myself confused by the fact that the people are ignoring the documentation even when it comes to cryptography. 🫤

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant