Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename atm files to standardized form #3271

Open
2 tasks
WalterKolczynski-NOAA opened this issue Jan 27, 2025 · 1 comment
Open
2 tasks

Rename atm files to standardized form #3271

WalterKolczynski-NOAA opened this issue Jan 27, 2025 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
feature New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@WalterKolczynski-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor

What new functionality do you need?

All intermediate and final atm output should be standardized according to proposed format.

What are the requirements for the new functionality?

All atm output should use the standardized format RUN.wave.tHHz.product[.domain][.fHHH].suffix, as per the COM inventory spreadsheet.

Acceptance Criteria

  • All atm output matches the new filenames in the COM inventory spreadsheet
  • Other than filenames, atm output is identical to before

Suggest a solution (optional)

No response

@WalterKolczynski-NOAA WalterKolczynski-NOAA added feature New feature or request triage Issues that are triage labels Jan 27, 2025
@WalterKolczynski-NOAA WalterKolczynski-NOAA self-assigned this Jan 27, 2025
@WalterKolczynski-NOAA WalterKolczynski-NOAA removed the triage Issues that are triage label Jan 27, 2025
@WalterKolczynski-NOAA WalterKolczynski-NOAA added this to the GFS v17 milestone Jan 27, 2025
@DWesl
Copy link
Contributor

DWesl commented Feb 4, 2025

All atm output should use the standardized format RUN.wave.tHHz.product[.domain][.fHHH].suffix, as per the COM inventory spreadsheet.

Should that be RUN.atm.tHHz.product[.domain][.fHHH].suffix?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants