From a11f2072a03e2c001a6dbb1e283295d4a7b49685 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Darren A. Natale" Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 15:07:48 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Update fp-019-term-stability.md to address a few CM suggestions --- principles/fp-019-term-stability.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/principles/fp-019-term-stability.md b/principles/fp-019-term-stability.md index e0cfe0bfc..4c54323ed 100644 --- a/principles/fp-019-term-stability.md +++ b/principles/fp-019-term-stability.md @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ For OBO format, there are multiple alternatives: [Typedef] id: has_obsolescence_reason name: has obsolescence reason -xref: IAO:0000233 +xref: IAO:0000231 is_metadata_tag: true ``` Then: @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ Criteria for review The OBO Dashboard will show: - An ERROR if any obsolete term (that is, a term with an "owl:deprecated" property or "is_obsolete: true" tag) does not also have 'obsolete ' (that exact string, lowercase and space included, with no other punctuation) prepended to the label - An ERROR if any obsolete term (as indicated by term label or definition) lacks an "owl:deprecated" property or "is_obsolete: true" tag -- An ERROR if an obsolete term has any associated logical axioms (including any subClassOf/is_a declarations) +- An ERROR if an obsolete term has, itself, any logical axioms (including any subClassOf/is_a declarations) or if it is referenced by logical axioms from other terms - A WARN if there is at least one term with 'OBSOLETE. ' prepended to the definition but not all obsolete terms are likewise prepended [This check is automatically validated.](checks/fp_019)