Questions about ExaCA function in AdditiveFoam #60
-
|
I tried to run AMB2018-02-B tutorial case with the ExaCA function. However, the error "Must provide path to input file on the command line." always popped. The input.json is readable according to the test. And I also put material data in the ExaCA folder. None of them helpful to solve the problem I encountered. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
|
Thank you for your interest in using AdditiveFOAM! If the function line in I apologize that our webpage documentation has not been updated since the latest release. To run the tutorial with ExaCA, you should use the following command: You can verify this in the Allrun script, where this option enables the Function Object in If you continue to encounter issues after making this change, the error may be on the ExaCA side. Please provide the log files for both AdditiveFOAM and ExaCA so we can assist you further in debugging. Thank you! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@Liana-Quinn - It looks AdditiveFOAM and the ExaCA Function Object ran fine (according to the log.additiveFoam file). The issue appears to be when running the ExaCA executable itself. ExaCA is a cellular-automata code for predicting the explicit solidification structure, in this case, using the solidification data from AdditiveFOAM. @MattRolchigo, can you look at the log file to see why there is a parsing error? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
It looks like there may be a typo in the Allrun.txt file - ExaCA does not take a
-iflag on the command line, the input file argument directly follows the executable (see https://github.com/LLNL/ExaCA/blob/master/README.md for examples).