We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
For GDTF imports, it's extremely common to see capabilities that look like this:
"Dim": { "highlightValue": 255, "capabilities": [ { "dmxRange": [0, 0], "type": "Intensity", "brightnessStart": 0, "brightnessEnd": 1, "comment": "Closed" }, { "dmxRange": [1, 254], "type": "Intensity", "brightnessStart": 0, "brightnessEnd": 1 }, { "dmxRange": [255, 255], "type": "Intensity", "brightnessStart": 0, "brightnessEnd": 1, "comment": "Open" } ] }
I suspect that this structure is idiomatic in GDTF, but coming from OFL it just looks like a really convoluted way to write:
"Dim": { "capability": { "type": "Intensity" } }
(And similarly for ColorIntensity channels.)
ColorIntensity
It would be great if we could identify this pattern in the GDTF importer, and rewrite it in the simpler form automatically.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
For GDTF imports, it's extremely common to see capabilities that look like this:
I suspect that this structure is idiomatic in GDTF, but coming from OFL it just looks like a really convoluted way to write:
(And similarly for
ColorIntensity
channels.)It would be great if we could identify this pattern in the GDTF importer, and rewrite it in the simpler form automatically.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: