[META] paced trains

[SharglutDev]

All related issues for the paced trains feature

• Paul - new train ids : Change how trainschedule id is stored in the front part #10601
• Mathieu / Uriel - add paced train switch : Add switch for paced train #10604
• Paul - add new paced train : Add new paced train #10607
• Mathieu / Uriel - move trains action buttons : Move timetable train's action card to the right when hover #10606
• Mathieu / Uriel - timetable paced train item : Create TimetablePacedTrainItem #10608
• Mathieu / Uriel - timetable occurrence item : Create OccurrenceItem #10611
• Youness / Egor - connect new back-end endpoints to front : editoast: adapt timetable endpoint #10656
• Paul - add paced train filter in timetable : Filter paced trains #10610
• Paul - edit/duplicate/delete a paced train : Manage paced trains #10615
• Paul - update macro mode to support paced trains : Update macro mode to handle paced trains #10612
• Mathieu - update osrd-ui to support train service space time chart style : #11056
• Uriel - update import/export to support paced trains : Update import/export to support paced trains #10614
• ? - display simulation results for paced trains and train schedules : Display paced train simulation results #11054
• Uriel - select a train service in space time chart : Select a train service in space time chart #10613
• Uriel - drag a train service in space time chart : Drag a train service in space time chart #10781
• ? - remove paced train switch : Integrate paced train in osrd for everyone #10791

[Math-R]

@SharglutDev @Uriel-Sautron, about the occurrence item selection, i think we miss an issue to split work properly.

When you project a pacedTrain, you must get his path and then populate TrainSpaceTimeData[] during the use of useScenarioData with the occurrences generated because of the step and durationvalue.
Those occurences post-treated by the cutProjectedTrain (filter function) function will be necessary to use the usePath hook from theuseManchetteWithSpaceTimeChart hook.

So what about create an additional issue to handle this ? and keep the current occurenceItem PR has an integration one ?