You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When I profile a script, it always calls python from a specific conda environment, which is always the one selected for the workspace.
Indeed the extension infers the Python executable to invoke on the basis of the Python interpreter selected for the Python extension
It would be nice if austin could be run with environment assigned to the script being profiled.
Ah I didn't know it was possible to assign an interpreter/environment to a script. In theory it should be possible to use this environment instead, but I'm not sure where that information would be coming from.
If it is not possible, how can I define the environment it uses (where can I specify the default python path)?
I think for now the solution would be to use an Austin task and pass the path to the python executable within the desired environment via the args property.
When I profile a script, it always calls python from a specific conda environment, which is always the one selected for the workspace.
It would be nice if austin could be run with environment assigned to the script being profiled.
If it is not possible, how can I define the environment it uses (where can I specify the default python path)?
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: