Replace Vulgate with sourced edition

[lcerrato]

See https://github.com/PerseusDL/canonical_protected/issues/13
and #277

[lcerrato]

https://trello.com/c/5xE9jYsY/70-vulgate

[lcerrato]

@AlisonBabeu
Is the Vulgate split between tlg0527 (OT) and tlg0031 (NT)?
I am thinking of using the Archive.org edition linked from the Trello card above:
https://archive.org/details/bibliasacravulga0000unse_q4b0/page/n25/mode/2up?view=theater

[AlisonBabeu]

hi @lcerrato, there is one STOA ID for the entire Latin text of the Vulgate stoa0162, but yes otherwise the IDS for the individual books are split between tlg0527 for the OT and tlg0031 for the NT.

[lcerrato]

@AlisonBabeu Let me know which one(s) I should use. I think we break things up by book, right?

[lcerrato]

@AlisonBabeu Also, I don't know anything about these editions, so I just went with a 1922 copy.

[AlisonBabeu]

hi @lcerrato you actually have to use both IDs in that there are only tlg0527 IDs for the OT and only tlg0031 for the NT and these are the IDs that the Scaife uses for the two Testaments. Or am I answering the wrong question

[lcerrato]

@AlisonBabeu I'm asking about representing each book as its own file versus the entire Vulgate. The tlg0527 applies to OT books and the tlg0031 applies to NT books, so I get that.
I'm guessing that is preferred to a single Vulgate file (=stoa0162).

[lcerrato]

It will also make it easier to work on this a little at a time.

[AlisonBabeu]

That does make sense and unless I'm confused all the OT and NT Vulgate books that are currently on the Scaife Viewer are all stored as individual TEI-XML files.

[lcerrato]

There isn’t a vulgate as it is in canonical protected.

[AlisonBabeu]

Yes that is quite true!

…

On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 7:41 PM Lisa Cerrato ***@***.***> wrote: There isn’t a vulgate as it is in canonical protected. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#497 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABDSSSXQLSUKGXGUDIPKGMDWTCES3ANCNFSM6AAAAAARVLZGDQ> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[lcerrato]

So there are files here https://github.com/PerseusDL/canonical_protected/tree/master/data/tlg0527 and here https://github.com/PerseusDL/canonical_protected/tree/master/data/tlg0031
Which is how I’ll enter this one.

[lcerrato]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixto-Clementine_Vulgate

[lcerrato]

@AlisonBabeu
I don't think I have the version I want for this. I wanted an earlier version closer to Jerome, but I cannot find anything online to point me in the right direction. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex_Amiatinus
Everything I find online is either unsourced, or a later version (Clementine or Sixto-Clementine) and I can't figure out where the Perseus edition came from and how we determine its validity.

[AlisonBabeu]

Hi @lcerrato I'm not at all certain how to advise you on how to progress at this point.

[lcerrato]

@AlisonBabeu
Perhaps there is something in WorldCat? My results are too broad to be useful. I think a Biblical studies librarian might know the answer.
All of the websites either have no downloads or no bibliographic info (or both).

[AlisonBabeu]

@lcerrato there might be but Worldcat recently redid its interface alas so I'm not sure how much help it might be. I know Micah at Tisch who taught the DH class is the reference librarian for religion we could try asking for help there or advice perhaps. Are there are any listservs that might be helpful here?

[lcerrato]

I'm not enough of a listserv person to know. We have to decide if what we have is good enough or not. Last time I researched the question, there was a copyright question on the edition.

[lcerrato]

Bruce may have some ideas.

[AlisonBabeu]

Not a bad plan to start by asking Bruce! Is it wrong that I am not thinking of the song lyric "Don't let me down Bruce!"

…

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 3:59 PM Lisa Cerrato ***@***.***> wrote: Bruce may have some ideas. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#497 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABDSSSWQHB6UMDBH4TETO7LWTGTJ3ANCNFSM6AAAAAARVLZGDQ> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[lcerrato]

One of the great misheard lyrics of our time!😛

[AlisonBabeu]

I thought we could use a smile!

[gcelano]

The Latin texts at https://sourceforge.net/projects/zefania-sharp/files/Bibles/LAT/ seem to be out of copyright. Conversion into EPIDOC does not seem to be complicated.