Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Item duplication glitch #534

Open
1 task done
RobIux opened this issue Feb 7, 2025 · 2 comments
Open
1 task done

Item duplication glitch #534

RobIux opened this issue Feb 7, 2025 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@RobIux
Copy link
Contributor

RobIux commented Feb 7, 2025

I've searched existing issues and couldn't find a duplicate.

  • I confirm this is not a duplicate.

Operating System

Windows

Server Software Version/Commit

2e2fe83

What happened?

Items can be duplicated within minutes to an above max_stack_number and have multiple thousands of items dropped on ground causing lag issues.

To Reproduce

Steps to reproduce

Give yourself 64 stone
Use ctrl +q to drop said stone
Pick up stone and u should have 127
Hold down ctrl + q and your stone will infinitly duplicate>

Unrelated issue that might be helpfull for fixing this

Give yourself 2 totems
Drop 1 totem
Totem that gets picked up ignore max_stack_size and turns 1 totem into 2 totems
Press q on the totem
You have now duplicated the totem

Expected behavior

Item giving correct amount back after pickup

@RobIux RobIux added the bug Something isn't working label Feb 7, 2025
@BigPebble123
Copy link

The title should rather be: "Picking up items does not respect the maximum amount of material being picked up"

@RobIux
Copy link
Contributor Author

RobIux commented Feb 9, 2025

The title should rather be: "Picking up items does not respect the maximum amount of material being picked up"

no it duplciates the items

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants