From 5d7497e00108e511d3f66a35a4cb3bf6036bf3f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Jitka=20Kadle=C4=8D=C3=ADkov=C3=A1?=
 <91805211+jkadlecikova@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2024 14:06:53 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Update index.md

---
 index.md | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/index.md b/index.md
index d1750d8..f0caef3 100644
--- a/index.md
+++ b/index.md
@@ -207,11 +207,10 @@ This talk concerns a work-in-progress project on adding nominals and the operato
 Franci Magraviti *(University of Padua)*
 
 <div style="text-align: justify"> 
-Is the notion of variable sharing central to relevant logic, or is it a mere byproduct? And how should it be expressed and understood? In this talk I want to explore a particular approach to addressing such questions, which is to look at the possible roles of the property under consideration (in this case, variable sharing) within practices outside of (the discipline of) logic itself. The idea is that, if a property P is core to a logic, then this should manifest in the way said logic partakes in other practices; conversely, looking at out-of-logic practices should provide insights (or at least support existing insights) into the best way to formulate P. Here I will focus on two (time permitting) case studies, inspired by the literature on relevant mathematics and feminist relevant logic: </div>
-<br>
+Is the notion of variable sharing central to relevant logic, or is it a mere byproduct? And how should it be expressed and understood? In this talk I want to explore a particular approach to addressing such questions, which is to look at the possible roles of the property under consideration (in this case, variable sharing) within practices outside of (the discipline of) logic itself. The idea is that, if a property P is core to a logic, then this should manifest in the way said logic partakes in other practices; conversely, looking at out-of-logic practices should provide insights (or at least support existing insights) into the best way to formulate P. Here I will focus on two (time permitting) case studies, inspired by the literature on relevant mathematics and feminist relevant logic: </div>\\
+
 <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 1. if relevant logic is (in some sense) a good logic for mathematics, what is the mathematical value (as in: the value from the perspective of working mathematicians) of variable sharing? </div>
-<div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 2. if relevant logic is (in some sense) a good liberatory logic, what is the liberatory value of variable sharing? </div>
-<br>
+<div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 2. if relevant logic is (in some sense) a good liberatory logic, what is the liberatory value of variable sharing? </div>\\
 
 <a name="yale"></a> **Shallow Syntactic Properties, Deep Semantic Correlates, and Variable Sharing**\\
 Yale Weiss *(Philosophy Program and Saul Kripke Center, The Graduate Center, CUNY)*