You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am writing a custom Processor which can be used for several of my models, but in which I need to have access to the name of the table.
Currently I am working around this by creating an abstract processor and one concrete implementation per table. The concrete implementation returns just the name of the entity.
Suggestion: pass the definition of the fixture in the constructor of the processor to be able to access this kind of metadata.
Would be happy to contribute if you agree.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
I am writing a custom Processor which can be used for several of my models, but in which I need to have access to the name of the table.
Currently I am working around this by creating an abstract processor and one concrete implementation per table. The concrete implementation returns just the name of the entity.
Suggestion: pass the definition of the fixture in the constructor of the processor to be able to access this kind of metadata.
Would be happy to contribute if you agree.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: