-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(ui5-writer): abstract functions #1040
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 26c0caa The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 13 packages
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
This reverts commit 9debc7e.
…ithub.com/SAP/open-ux-tools into feat/1039/ui5-writer-function-abstraction
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @cianmSAP
Refactoring is as described.
Ran UX_DEBUG tests locally and all looks good.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- I focused review on
@sap-ux/project-access
, code changes look good - Test coverage looks good
- Did not build and test locally
- The code smell regarding duplicate enum values is hard to address, because the two different keys point currently to the same value
Approved from my side
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No code changes since last review, just merge of main into this branch and pipeline restart.
Approved again.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nothing to add to the other two approvals, no issues found in coding or changeset.
Just a comment (no need to change it though): the async
await
in the factories isn't necessary, just the change to Promise<void>
in the factory declaration should have been necessary.
#1039