Skip to content

Bump C++ standard from 17 to 20 #1266

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
2 tasks done
HenrZu opened this issue Apr 28, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #1267
Open
2 tasks done

Bump C++ standard from 17 to 20 #1266

HenrZu opened this issue Apr 28, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #1267
Labels
class::improvement Cleanup that doesn't affect functionality loc::backend This issue concerns the C++ backend implementation.

Comments

@HenrZu
Copy link
Contributor

HenrZu commented Apr 28, 2025

Motivation / Current Behaviour

After upgrading the latest/min Ubuntu version, we also updated the version of the clang/gcc compiler. After discussion, we decided to move to c++ 20.

Enhancement description

trivial.

Additional context

No response

Checklist

  • Attached labels, especially loc:: or model:: labels.
  • Linked to project
@HenrZu HenrZu added class::improvement Cleanup that doesn't affect functionality loc::backend This issue concerns the C++ backend implementation. labels Apr 28, 2025
@HenrZu HenrZu changed the title U Bump C++ Standard from C++17 to C++20 Apr 28, 2025
@HenrZu HenrZu changed the title Bump C++ Standard from C++17 to C++20 Bump C++ Standard from 17 to 20 Apr 28, 2025
@HenrZu HenrZu changed the title Bump C++ Standard from 17 to 20 Bump C++ standard from 17 to 20 Apr 28, 2025
@HenrZu HenrZu linked a pull request Apr 28, 2025 that will close this issue
12 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
class::improvement Cleanup that doesn't affect functionality loc::backend This issue concerns the C++ backend implementation.
Projects
Status: Product Backlog
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant