New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Identify how to incorporate affordability logic with transportation logic #23

Open

kjs222 opened this issue Jul 12, 2016 · 1 comment

Labels

affordability transportation

Contributor

kjs222 commented Jul 12, 2016

Which is the first cut - affordability or trans?
Can/should there be a combined analysis, or sequential, etc.

kjs222 added affordability transportation labels

Contributor Author

kjs222 commented Jul 18, 2016

weighting importance of trans over affordability

user stories:

6 neighs below rent threshold - 3 closest rents are farthest distances from key destinations
0 neighs below rent threshold - 3 lowest are very far away, next three are not much more expensive but much closer

ideas: give three responses to user:
3 best trans - MVP
3 best aff - MVP
3 best based on our internal algorithm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment