You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: markdown/redfield/03-CGME_ULE.md
+16-24Lines changed: 16 additions & 24 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -16,8 +16,7 @@ coupling to an Ohmic bath via $\sigma_z$ operator. We solve the open system dyna
16
16
17
17
Coarse-grained ME is a completely copositive ME that can be obtained by applying an additional time coarse graining approximate to the Redfield equation. More details of CGME can be found in [Mozgunov and Lidar](https://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2020-02-06-227/). We first solve the original Redfield equation and CGME and compare the instantaneous ground state population of both cases.
18
18
19
-
````julia
20
-
19
+
```julia
21
20
using OrdinaryDiffEq, Plots, LaTeXStrings
22
21
using QuantumAnnealingTools
23
22
@@ -37,16 +36,15 @@ U = InplaceUnitary(U)
37
36
38
37
@time solr =solve_redfield(annealing, tf, U, alg=Tsit5())
39
38
# we set the integration error tolerance to 1e-5 for speed
40
-
@time solc =solve_CGME(annealing, tf, U, alg=Tsit5(), int_atol=1e-5, int_rtol=1e-5)
39
+
@time solc =solve_cgme(annealing, tf, U, alg=Tsit5(), int_atol=1e-5, int_rtol=1e-5)
From above picture, we can see that the jump correlator and two point correlation function roughly have the same time scale. To avoid recalculating the inverse Fourier transform within the solver, we can precalcuate $g(t)$ and construct interpolation from these pre-computed values. This procedure can be done by the following code:
0 commit comments