You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm using KOReader for these stardicts. They work great, except that there is no grammar metadata. Maybe you can put them on the first line italicized, just like the Wiktionary website. Also, since not all tools support fuzzy lookups, maybe you can also provide a version with unaccented headwords.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It's a good point about the grammatical information. The only question that remains is what parts of it should be included. I'd say part of speech, gender, and aspect. I wouldn't want to clutter it with useless info so that you have to scroll for the definitions. So probably no Zaliznyak classification or the suffix/prefix stuff. What do you think? (I also don't know yet when I'll add it, I wanted to do some testing with Github Actions first.)
I think the dictionary should work with all Stardict engines because even though the headword is stressed, an unstressed version of it is in the inflections. So as long as inflections are supported it should work. 😀
I'm using KOReader for these stardicts. They work great, except that there is no grammar metadata. Maybe you can put them on the first line italicized, just like the Wiktionary website. Also, since not all tools support fuzzy lookups, maybe you can also provide a version with unaccented headwords.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: