Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Add] Topic emotions #155

Open
12 tasks
JamesPHoughton opened this issue Nov 2, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
12 tasks

[Add] Topic emotions #155

JamesPHoughton opened this issue Nov 2, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
Survey A sourced survey to implement

Comments

@JamesPHoughton
Copy link
Contributor

JamesPHoughton commented Nov 2, 2023

Add a new survey to the repository according to the instructions in the package README.md.

Wisneski, Daniel C., Brittany E. Hanson, and G. Scott Morgan. 2020. “The Roles of Disgust and Harm Perception in Political Attitude Moralization.” Politics and the Life Sciences: The Journal of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 39 (2): 215–27.

Emotions. We assessed participants’ emotional reactions to the water crisis on both waves using the Discrete Emotions Questionnaire (Harmon-Jones et al., 2016). Participants reported their emotional reactions to the Flint water crisis in response to the item “ Thinking about the water crisis in Flint, Michigan, to what extent do you feel the following emotions?” To assess their feelings of disgust, participants reported how much they felt dis-gust, grossed out, nausea, and revulsion (Wave 1: α= .91, Wave 2: α = .91). To assess how angry participants felt, they reported how much they felt anger, rage, mad, and pissed off (Wave 1: α = .94, Wave 2: α = .94). Finally, to assess how sad they felt (a negative emotion that we did not attempt to manipulate), participants reported how much they felt sadness and grief (Wave 1: α = .83, Wave 2: α = .82). Answers to these questions were reported using a 7-point scale with the response options not at all, slightly, somewhat, moderately, quite a bit, very much, an extreme amount.

Ciuk, David J., and Joshua Rottman. 2021. “Moral Conviction, Emotion, and the Influence of Episodic versus Thematic Frames.” Political Communication 38 (5): 519–38.

Finally, respondents were asked to indicate the extent to which the prompt made them feel a sense of anger, disgust, sadness, anxiety, and fear (fear was only measured in the Lucid sample). All responses were coded on a 5-point ascending scale, and all responses were combined in a summated rating scale

Survey Title

"Super Special Survey" <- note, this is just a placeholder name - replace it with the name of the actual survey.

Survey Source

Survey Overview

Aggregation/scoring function

Tasks

  • Create a new folder in surveys w/ descriptive, easy-to-read name superSpecialSurvey/
  • Create SurveyJS .json file (e.g. superSpecialSurvey/superSpecialSurvey.json)
    • Change the default completion page to a blank page ("showCompletedPage": false)
  • Create a .bib file citing your references for the survey (always: superSpecialSurvey/references.bib)
  • Create file with function to aggregate survey data (e.g. superSpecialSurvey.score.js)
  • Create a cypress test of the survey (e.g. superSpecialSurvey.cy.jsx)
    • Include a line to take a screenshot at the end of every page
  • Create a readme markdown file to document (always: superSpecialSurvey/README.md)
    • Include relevant screenshots
  • Update the package minor version
  • Rebuild the package using npm run build to update SHAs
  • Create PR and link to this issue
@JamesPHoughton JamesPHoughton added the Survey A sourced survey to implement label Nov 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Survey A sourced survey to implement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant