Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Meta-data scope of the package: Progressive aggregation #33

Open
abenassi opened this issue Jun 9, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

Meta-data scope of the package: Progressive aggregation #33

abenassi opened this issue Jun 9, 2015 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@abenassi
Copy link
Owner

abenassi commented Jun 9, 2015

When facing hierarchical groups of time data series, there are groups of them that added together conform an aggregated time data series that is also present in the spreadsheet. In these cases, the name of the low-level series should be composed to reflect that they are part of a high-level one (eg. "GDP" can be decomposed into 10 chapters like "Agriculture", "Services", etc. - see test cases 6 and 7 for an example of this). This could be addressed later on the process, as something optional, after the package already extracted successfully all the series with their low-level names. The implementation of this feature though, is a low priority for the moment given its complexity and little value added for the expected user case.

  • Exploring all the possible adding combinations of the first values of the series in order, assuming that aggregated series should immediately follow (or being right before) a group of low-level ones (test case 6) could be a reasonable strategy.
  • Exploring all the possible adding combinations disregarding the order is another possibility, but this would take much more time.
  • Using additional characteristics of the header cells format could be another strategy, but is complicated to generalize enough to make this strategy useful in a variety of cases (test case 7).
@abenassi abenassi added the Idea label Jun 9, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant