-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[question]: do we really need playwright library or not? #56
Comments
Are you looking to connect the library with an existing playwright connection? If yes, we can check the possibility to do so. |
I found that setting the I'm finding when I follow the exact example in the readme, I get the following ![]() Edit: turning off Another edit: Sorry, I missed the "Using with the Playwright test-runner" part of the readme, where it shows how to support parallel runs. Not to nitpick but shouldn't this section be near the top of the readme? Isn't this what most people are using this library for? |
I found if I use the following code, then the playwright library can be removed:
test("Ligthouse performance test", async ({playwright}) => {
const browser = await playwright.chromium.launch({
args: ['--remote-debugging-port=9222'],
});
....
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: