You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the project lacks support for integrating models deployed via Xinference, such as large language models (LLMs), embedding models, rerank models, and multimodal embedding models. This limits the flexibility and scalability of the project, as Xinference provides a robust and efficient way to deploy and manage these models. Without this integration, users are unable to leverage the advanced capabilities of Xinference-deployed models within the project.
Example: "I often find it frustrating when I need to use advanced models like LLMs or multimodal embeddings in my project, but the current setup doesn’t support Xinference, which is my preferred deployment tool. This forces me to use less efficient or less scalable alternatives."
Proposed Solution
I propose adding support for Xinference-deployed models to the project. This would involve:
Integration with Xinference API: Implement functionality to connect to Xinference-deployed models via its API. This includes support for:
Large Language Models (LLMs)
Embedding Models
Rerank Models
Multimodal Embedding Models
Model Configuration: Allow users to configure Xinference-deployed models through a simple configuration file or environment variables. This should include:
Model endpoints
API keys (if required)
Model-specific parameters (e.g., temperature, max tokens for LLMs)
Seamless Usage: Ensure that the integration allows for seamless usage of these models within the existing project workflow. For example:
Embedding models should work with existing vector search functionality.
LLMs should integrate with the project’s text generation or chat features.
Rerank models should enhance search or recommendation systems.
Documentation: Provide clear documentation on how to set up and use Xinference-deployed models within the project.
Alternatives Considered
Local Model Deployment: One alternative is to deploy models locally without using Xinference. However, this approach is less scalable and requires more resources, making it less ideal for production environments.
Other Model Deployment Tools: I considered using other model deployment tools, but Xinference stands out due to its ease of use, scalability, and support for a wide range of models.
Similar Features: Other projects like LangChain and Haystack have integrations with various model deployment tools, which could serve as inspiration for this implementation.
Use Case: This feature would be particularly useful for users who need to deploy and manage multiple models in a scalable and efficient manner, especially in production environments.
This feature request outlines the need for Xinference support in the project and provides a clear path for implementation. If accepted, it would significantly enhance the project’s capabilities and flexibility.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@moshilangzi Thanks for such a detailed request. We really appreciate it. We've added this to our community wishlist. However, it will definitely take some time on our end due to current priorities. If you have some time, feel free to explore & contribute.
Problem Description
Currently, the project lacks support for integrating models deployed via Xinference, such as large language models (LLMs), embedding models, rerank models, and multimodal embedding models. This limits the flexibility and scalability of the project, as Xinference provides a robust and efficient way to deploy and manage these models. Without this integration, users are unable to leverage the advanced capabilities of Xinference-deployed models within the project.
Example: "I often find it frustrating when I need to use advanced models like LLMs or multimodal embeddings in my project, but the current setup doesn’t support Xinference, which is my preferred deployment tool. This forces me to use less efficient or less scalable alternatives."
Proposed Solution
I propose adding support for Xinference-deployed models to the project. This would involve:
Integration with Xinference API: Implement functionality to connect to Xinference-deployed models via its API. This includes support for:
Large Language Models (LLMs)
Embedding Models
Rerank Models
Multimodal Embedding Models
Model Configuration: Allow users to configure Xinference-deployed models through a simple configuration file or environment variables. This should include:
Model endpoints
API keys (if required)
Model-specific parameters (e.g., temperature, max tokens for LLMs)
Seamless Usage: Ensure that the integration allows for seamless usage of these models within the existing project workflow. For example:
Embedding models should work with existing vector search functionality.
LLMs should integrate with the project’s text generation or chat features.
Rerank models should enhance search or recommendation systems.
Documentation: Provide clear documentation on how to set up and use Xinference-deployed models within the project.
Alternatives Considered
Local Model Deployment: One alternative is to deploy models locally without using Xinference. However, this approach is less scalable and requires more resources, making it less ideal for production environments.
Other Model Deployment Tools: I considered using other model deployment tools, but Xinference stands out due to its ease of use, scalability, and support for a wide range of models.
Additional Context
Xinference Documentation: Xinference Models
Similar Features: Other projects like LangChain and Haystack have integrations with various model deployment tools, which could serve as inspiration for this implementation.
Use Case: This feature would be particularly useful for users who need to deploy and manage multiple models in a scalable and efficient manner, especially in production environments.
This feature request outlines the need for Xinference support in the project and provides a clear path for implementation. If accepted, it would significantly enhance the project’s capabilities and flexibility.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: