New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Places API #117

Open

bardolf69 opened this issue Jan 4, 2025 · 3 comments

bardolf69 commented Jan 4, 2025

Is it possible to update the places API to allow for the includedPrimaryTypes and excludedPrimaryTypes

Author

bardolf69 commented Jan 4, 2025

ah wait I see you are still using the old places API

bardolf69 closed this as completed

Author

bardolf69 commented Jan 6, 2025 via email

Have a look at this one instead About the Places API (New) | Google for Developers<https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/places/web-service/op-overview> From: Alexander Pechkarev ***@***.***> Sent: Sunday, January 5, 2025 2:05 AM To: alexpechkarev/google-maps ***@***.***> Cc: bardolf69 ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [alexpechkarev/google-maps] Places API (Issue #117) Hi @bardolf69<https://github.com/bardolf69>, The package uses the new Places API, here is the list of accepted parameters<https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/javascript/reference/autocomplete-data#AutocompleteRequest.includedPrimaryTypes>. You can also try the demo<https://places-autocomplete-demo.pages.dev/>. - Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#117 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALNACZHWFRRHT7YOVY5OL6T2JAWEFAVCNFSM6AAAAABUTDJLSSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDKNZRGM4DINZUGA>. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.******@***.***>>

Owner

alexpechkarev commented Jan 6, 2025

Applogies, I have confused my self with a different package I am currently working on.
Could you please suggest new changes in PR?

alexpechkarev reopened this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment