|
| 1 | +# Requirements of `AsyncContext.Snapshot` |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +`AsyncContext.Snapshot` presents two unique requirements: |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +- It does not expose the value associated with any `Variable` instances. |
| 6 | +- It captures _all_ `Variable`s' current value and restores those values |
| 7 | + at a later time. |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +The above requirements are essential to decouple a queueing implementation |
| 10 | +from the consumers of `Variable` instances. For example, a scheduler can queue |
| 11 | +an async task and take a snapshot of the current context: |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +```typescript |
| 14 | +// The scheduler doesn't access any AsyncContext.Variable. |
| 15 | +const scheduler = { |
| 16 | + queue: [], |
| 17 | + postTask(task) { |
| 18 | + // Each callback is stored with the context at which it was enqueued. |
| 19 | + const snapshot = new AsyncContext.Snapshot(); |
| 20 | + queue.push({ snapshot, task }); |
| 21 | + }, |
| 22 | + runWhenIdle() { |
| 23 | + const queue = this.queue; |
| 24 | + this.queue = []; |
| 25 | + for (const { snapshot, task } of queue) { |
| 26 | + // All tasks in the queue would be run with the current context if they |
| 27 | + // hadn't been wrapped with the snapshot. |
| 28 | + snapshot.run(task); |
| 29 | + } |
| 30 | + } |
| 31 | +}; |
| 32 | +``` |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +In this example, the scheduler can propagate values of `Variable`s but doesn't |
| 35 | +have access to any `Variable` instance. They are not coupled with a specific |
| 36 | +consumer of `Variable`. A consumer of `Variable` will not be coupled with a |
| 37 | +specific scheduler as well. |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +A consumer like a tracer can use `Variable` without knowing how the scheduler |
| 40 | +is implemented: |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +```typescript |
| 43 | +// tracer.js |
| 44 | +const asyncVar = new AsyncContext.Variable(); |
| 45 | +export function run(cb) { |
| 46 | + // Create a new span and run the callback with it. |
| 47 | + const span = { |
| 48 | + startTime: Date.now(), |
| 49 | + traceId: randomUUID(), |
| 50 | + spanId: randomUUID(), |
| 51 | + }; |
| 52 | + asyncVar.run(span, cb); |
| 53 | +} |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +export function end() { |
| 56 | + // Get the current span from the AsyncContext.Variable and end it. |
| 57 | + const span = asyncVar.get(); |
| 58 | + span?.endTime = Date.now(); |
| 59 | +} |
| 60 | +``` |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +The `Snapshot` API enables user-land queueing implementations to be cooperate |
| 63 | +with any consumers of `Variable`. For instances, a queueing implementation can |
| 64 | +be: |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +- A user-land Promise-like implementation, |
| 67 | +- A user multiplexer that multiplexes an IO operation with a batch of async |
| 68 | + tasks. |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | +Without an API like `Snapshot`, a queueing implementation would have to be built |
| 71 | +on top of the built-in `Promise`, as it is the only way to capture the current |
| 72 | +`Variable` values and restore them later. This would limit the implementation |
| 73 | +of a user-land queueing. |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +```typescript |
| 76 | +const scheduler = { |
| 77 | + queue: [], |
| 78 | + postTask(task) { |
| 79 | + const { promise, resolve } = Promise.withResolvers(); |
| 80 | + // Captures the current context by `Promise.prototype.then`. |
| 81 | + promise.then(() => { |
| 82 | + task(); |
| 83 | + }); |
| 84 | + // Defers the task execution by resolving the promise. |
| 85 | + queue.push(resolve); |
| 86 | + }, |
| 87 | + runWhenIdle() { |
| 88 | + // LIMITATION: the tasks are not run synchronously. |
| 89 | + for (const cb of this.queue) { |
| 90 | + cb(); |
| 91 | + } |
| 92 | + this.queue = []; |
| 93 | + } |
| 94 | +}; |
| 95 | +``` |
0 commit comments