Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test cases #5

Open
kyrsjo opened this issue Nov 18, 2014 · 2 comments
Open

Test cases #5

kyrsjo opened this issue Nov 18, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@kyrsjo
Copy link
Collaborator

kyrsjo commented Nov 18, 2014

Add test cases for DYNK - check that attributes are correctly set for all supported elements, and that functions are correctly generated.

The general idea is to:

  • Check that the kicks are correctly applied, by running one simulation with no DYNK and setting the element properties in fort.2, comparing that to another simulation (with same initial conditions etc.) where the settings in fort.2 is something stupid, immediately reset in by DYNK from turn 1.
  • Check that we actually generate the correct functions and store them to the DYNK output file.

If there is a "standard" lattice used for testing SixTrack, we should use this. There may also be some kind of standard "test harness", i.e. a pile of scripts for automatically running the code with different input, checking the results, and producing some kind of GO/NO-GO output.

@ansantam
Copy link
Owner

/afs/cern.ch/user/a/ansantam/public/results

@ansantam
Copy link
Owner

ansantam commented Dec 5, 2014

/afs/cern.ch/user/a/ansantam/public/sixtrack_tests

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants