Skip to content

Publish Polaris BillOfMaterials (BOM) #788

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
adutra opened this issue Jan 15, 2025 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1216
Closed

Publish Polaris BillOfMaterials (BOM) #788

adutra opened this issue Jan 15, 2025 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1216
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@adutra
Copy link
Contributor

adutra commented Jan 15, 2025

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

It would help users to have a BOM for Polaris.

Describe the solution you'd like

No response

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

No response

@adutra adutra added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 15, 2025
@flyrain
Copy link
Contributor

flyrain commented Mar 13, 2025

Thanks for filing this issue. A BOM might be useful, but I don't think it's 1.0-blocker. Remove the label tentatively.
A reference PR: apache/iceberg#8065

cc @RussellSpitzer @eric-maynard

@flyrain flyrain added this to the 1.1.0 milestone Mar 13, 2025
@dimas-b
Copy link
Contributor

dimas-b commented Mar 13, 2025

I believe it is preferable to discuss the scope of 1.0 on the dev list or community sync.

@flyrain
Copy link
Contributor

flyrain commented Mar 13, 2025

That's a good idea. Let me gather more blockers and post them as a batch in the dev list.

@snazy snazy modified the milestones: 1.1.0, 1.0.0 Mar 17, 2025
snazy added a commit to snazy/polaris that referenced this issue Mar 19, 2025
@snazy snazy closed this as completed in 36a5b17 Mar 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants