Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: remove in-process functions worker project option #867

Conversation

stijnmoreels
Copy link
Member

Remove the project option to create an in-process Azure Functions project, since the .NET 8 framework does not support in-process. Also, remove the Databricks project since this was only supported for in-process models.

Relates to arcus-azure/arcus#311

@stijnmoreels stijnmoreels requested a review from fgheysels as a code owner May 2, 2024 04:45
Copy link

netlify bot commented May 2, 2024

Deploy Preview for arcus-templates canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 762788e
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/arcus-templates/deploys/66333ef662d0190008074fa5

@stijnmoreels stijnmoreels changed the title Feature/remove functions worker project option feat: remove functions worker project option May 2, 2024
@stijnmoreels stijnmoreels changed the title feat: remove functions worker project option feat: remove in-process functions worker project option May 2, 2024
@stijnmoreels stijnmoreels self-assigned this May 2, 2024
@stijnmoreels
Copy link
Member Author

Bear with me, it seems like a lot of changes, but they are almost all deletions. 😅

@stijnmoreels
Copy link
Member Author

Fails on Azure Functions EventHubs integration test, but also fails on main. Only thing changes there is that it uses a different func local tool since that was updated.

@stijnmoreels stijnmoreels merged commit ca6e01f into arcus-azure:main May 3, 2024
14 checks passed
@stijnmoreels stijnmoreels deleted the feature/remove-functions-worker-project-option branch May 3, 2024 04:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants