You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm wondering whether you have any thoughts on why your Hits@1 is substantially lower than many of the other teams in the ConvAI2 competition, while the scores from the human evaluation are the highest overall.
From the slides you presented, it looks like you didn't actually optimize a classification objective (just PPL, smoothed PPL, and an F1 risk objective). Do you think adding a classification objective might bump your Hits@1 up significantly?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for releasing the code!
I'm wondering whether you have any thoughts on why your Hits@1 is substantially lower than many of the other teams in the ConvAI2 competition, while the scores from the human evaluation are the highest overall.
From the slides you presented, it looks like you didn't actually optimize a classification objective (just PPL, smoothed PPL, and an F1 risk objective). Do you think adding a classification objective might bump your Hits@1 up significantly?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: