Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wishlist: public server mode #4

Open
Liontooth opened this issue Aug 17, 2014 · 8 comments
Open

Wishlist: public server mode #4

Liontooth opened this issue Aug 17, 2014 · 8 comments

Comments

@Liontooth
Copy link

Hi Brendan,

Thanks you for a really cool package! It works great. Is there a way to start a public server that several scripts can call?

Cheers,
Dave

@Liontooth Liontooth changed the title Wishlist: detached server mode Wishlist: public server mode Aug 17, 2014
@brendano
Copy link
Owner

That could be done with changes to sockwrap.py. No direct support currently though.

@ahalterman
Copy link

Yes, thanks for a great package! I use it every day, both for Open Event Data Alliance work and other projects, too. I'm also interested in getting it set up as a standalone server. Educational Testing Service has a standalone CoreNLP server (https://github.com/EducationalTestingService/stanford-thrift) but it's not as neat and nice as this one. @Liontooth, are you doing anything on on getting a server mode running? I'd be interesting in helping with a project to do this but my Java skills aren't very good.

@Liontooth
Copy link
Author

Hi ahalterman -- WordSeer added a load balancer, and zigeuner support for 3.4 on top of that, see https://github.com/zigeuner/stanford-corenlp-python. I haven't had time to pursue this but remain interested. Cheers, David

@ahalterman
Copy link

Thanks! I've gotten the zigeuner version up and running and I think it's probably enough for the project I'm doing right now. I'll let you know if I decide to start modifying this one.

@brendano
Copy link
Owner

brendano commented Feb 3, 2015

hi @ahalterman , do you still find this package useful, or have you switched to something else? i was fixing some things up, but if there's something else that's better i'd be happy to switch myself.

@johnb30
Copy link
Contributor

johnb30 commented Feb 12, 2015

Just a comment on the usefulness. We're still using this wrapper in our deployment and it's worked great.

@brendano
Copy link
Owner

thanks, good to know. i ran into some serious bugs when trying to use it more recently (see commit log and one of the closed issues) so i guess i was curious if they had bee showstoppers for everyone else

@brendano
Copy link
Owner

brendano commented Jul 3, 2015

FYI i now committed a change (merged from the namedpipe branch) where the socket mode isn't the default option. there's a new "pipe" mode that's now default. socket mode is still in there and it's probably the thing you want to modify if you want to make a public socket system. well, at least if you like the idiosyncratic communication protocol and stuff this system does

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants