Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Proposal to make IfcRelVoidsElement a one to many relationship --> IfcRelVoidElement #463

Open
TZwielehner opened this issue Mar 29, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Proposal to make IfcRelVoidsElement a one to many relationship --> IfcRelVoidElement #463

TZwielehner opened this issue Mar 29, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@TZwielehner
Copy link

In some of our models we have quite a lot of openings, especially for slabs. It would be much easier (and leaner) to have one relationship manage multiple openings at once. I don't think it is necessary to have each IfcRelVoidsElement as a rooted element; maybe a set/list would be more efficient?
@theoryshaw
Copy link
Contributor

theoryshaw commented Apr 14, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Wholeheartedly agree!

related:

This was referenced Apr 14, 2022
Open
Closed
@TZwielehner
Copy link
Author

My request is the other way around. Atm I need a rel voids for each opening in every element e.g. slab. I would like to combine those into one rel void with on relating element and many relating openings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@theoryshaw @TZwielehner