We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Description of the proposal: Make IfcLoop and IfcVertex entities abstract.
IfcLoop
IfcVertex
They do not possess any attributes, therefore I don't see any reason to see them in a physical file. E.g.:
#90 = IFCLOOP();
Therefore: make them ABSTRACT.
ABSTRACT
What do we win: clearer schema.
What do we loose: nothing.
Schema impact: backward compatible, I would even suggest updating the old schemas as well.
Instance model impact: No chance to submit a file with entities like IfcLoop and/or IfcVertex.
Backwards compatible: Yes.
Automatic migration possible: ?
Additional implications: ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Description of the proposal:
Make
IfcLoop
andIfcVertex
entities abstract.They do not possess any attributes, therefore I don't see any reason to see them in a physical file. E.g.:
Therefore: make them
ABSTRACT
.What do we win: clearer schema.
What do we loose: nothing.
Schema impact: backward compatible, I would even suggest updating the old schemas as well.
Instance model impact: No chance to submit a file with entities like
IfcLoop
and/orIfcVertex
.Backwards compatible: Yes.
Automatic migration possible: ?
Additional implications: ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: