Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IfcLoop and IfcVertex are not ABSTRACT? #65

Open
pjanck opened this issue Aug 6, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

IfcLoop and IfcVertex are not ABSTRACT? #65

pjanck opened this issue Aug 6, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@pjanck
Copy link

pjanck commented Aug 6, 2020

Description of the proposal:
Make IfcLoop and IfcVertex entities abstract.

They do not possess any attributes, therefore I don't see any reason to see them in a physical file. E.g.:

#90 = IFCLOOP();

Therefore: make them ABSTRACT.

What do we win: clearer schema.

What do we loose: nothing.

Schema impact: backward compatible, I would even suggest updating the old schemas as well.

Instance model impact: No chance to submit a file with entities like IfcLoop and/or IfcVertex.

Backwards compatible: Yes.

Automatic migration possible: ?

Additional implications: ?

@pjanck pjanck added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant