We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
from #129
"lumi_uncertainty": NN,
"luminosity_reference": "https://cds.cern.ch/record/NNNNN"
(datasets see #136)
https://cds.cern.ch/record/1643269
3.4% (3.6%) for proton-lead (for reversed beam direction)
Question: are these both values relevant to open data?
(datasets see #140)
3.7% for proton-proton data
(datasets see #139)
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2765655
relative uncertainty of 1.9%
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Done https://opendata-qa.web.cern.ch/search?page=1&size=20&q=&keywords=heavy-ion%20physics&subtype=Luminosity&type=Supplementaries
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
from #129
"lumi_uncertainty": NN,
"luminosity_reference": "https://cds.cern.ch/record/NNNNN"
2013 pPb 5.02 TeV data
(datasets see #136)
Luminosity reference
https://cds.cern.ch/record/1643269
Luminosity uncertainty
3.4% (3.6%) for proton-lead (for reversed beam direction)
Question: are these both values relevant to open data?
2013 pp 2.76 TeV ref
(datasets see #140)
Luminosity reference
https://cds.cern.ch/record/1643269
Luminosity uncertainty
3.7% for proton-proton data
2015 pp 5.02 TeV ref
(datasets see #139)
Luminosity reference
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2765655
Luminosity uncertainty
relative uncertainty of 1.9%
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: