Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DeepCShuffle - Feature Parity with Shuffle Node #24

Open
charlesangus opened this issue Apr 24, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

DeepCShuffle - Feature Parity with Shuffle Node #24

charlesangus opened this issue Apr 24, 2019 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@charlesangus
Copy link
Owner

DeepCShuffle should have feature parity with the base shuffle node. Interface should be same/identical.

@charlesangus charlesangus added good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Apr 24, 2019
@jonassorgenfrei
Copy link
Collaborator

I can jump on it :) To get more in the the Nuke Development :)

@jonassorgenfrei
Copy link
Collaborator

On a first look it feels like it needs custom knob setup right?

@charlesangus
Copy link
Owner Author

Nice, thanks!

I have no knowledge of how the new Shuffle node is set up, but I kinda hate how the new Shuffle node works anyway haha. Unless there's a new knob that handles the new Shuffle behavior, I'd say go for the old Shuffle.

At the simplest, the old shuffle could be just a bunch of Boolean knobs with callbacks to ensure only one per output is enabled.

Extra credit is colouring the knobs, which I'm not sure is documented. There's some strange behavior where if a knob is named specifically (e.g. red iirc), it will be coloured that way, but that's not really a scalable solution lol.

@jonassorgenfrei
Copy link
Collaborator

jonassorgenfrei commented Dec 7, 2021

Yeah after about 1h of research i couldnt find any clue of an exisiting setup for the Shuffle node without a lot of QT Hacking :P
Would start getting it to look like the old ShuffleCopy node as a first step then we can see if it's worth going further.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants