You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to thank you the work you have done to the community. Its a great layer that helps me and the community a lot! I was in the middle of upgrading my lambda to Node18 since I saw there is yet the support of Node20.
However, I encounter the issue of InvalidParameterValueException: Layers consume more than the available size of 262144000 bytes during my deployment. I found that the approach you were supporting Node16.x and Node18.x is doubling the package size. From 44.4 MB ([email protected]) to 79.7 MB in the latest release ([email protected]).
Would it be possible that each release is taking its own node version so that I can choose the respective Node version instead of dual support of the node version? Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
harrychyharry
changed the title
Single Node Version for each release
Single Node Version for Each Release
Jul 18, 2024
I would like to thank you the work you have done to the community. Its a great layer that helps me and the community a lot! I was in the middle of upgrading my lambda to Node18 since I saw there is yet the support of Node20.
However, I encounter the issue of
InvalidParameterValueException: Layers consume more than the available size of 262144000 bytes
during my deployment. I found that the approach you were supporting Node16.x and Node18.x is doubling the package size. From44.4 MB
([email protected]) to79.7 MB
in the latest release ([email protected]).Would it be possible that each release is taking its own node version so that I can choose the respective Node version instead of dual support of the node version? Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: