|
| 1 | +# 010-greenhouse-workstation-tools |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +- Status: [draft] <!-- optional --> |
| 4 | +- Deciders: [HGW, Esther, Uwe] <!-- optional --> |
| 5 | +- Date: [YYYY-MM-DD when the decision was last updated] <!-- optional. To customize the ordering without relying on Git creation dates and filenames --> |
| 6 | +- Tags: [greenhouse / cloudoperators] <!-- optional --> |
| 7 | +- Technical Story: [description | ticket/issue URL] <!-- optional --> |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +## Context and Problem Statement |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +Provide Greenhouse operators with pre-authenticated, pre-installed CLI like hammer/screw, openstackcli, kubectl, spore, vault, u8s. |
| 12 | +Have some sort of startup logon script that scopes the user to the correct project and region. (like `setpw` on jumphost) |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +## Decision Drivers <!-- optional --> |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +- [driver 1, e.g., a force, facing concern, …] |
| 17 | +- [driver 2, e.g., a force, facing concern, …] |
| 18 | +- … <!-- numbers of drivers can vary --> |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +## Considered Options |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +- [option 1] |
| 23 | +- [option 2] |
| 24 | +- [option 3] |
| 25 | +- … <!-- numbers of options can vary --> |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +## Decision Outcome |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +Chosen option: "[option 1]", |
| 30 | +because [justification. e.g., only option, which meets k.o. criterion decision driver | which resolves force force | … | comes out best (see below)]. |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +### Positive Consequences <!-- optional --> |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +- [e.g., improvement of quality attribute satisfaction, follow-up decisions required, …] |
| 35 | +- … |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +### Negative Consequences <!-- optional --> |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +- [e.g., compromising quality attribute, follow-up decisions required, …] |
| 40 | +- … |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +## Pros and Cons of the Options | Evaluation of options <!-- optional --> |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +### [option 1] |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional --> |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | +| Decision Driver | Rating | Reason | |
| 49 | +|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------| |
| 50 | +| [decision driver a] | +++ | Good, because [argument a] | | |
| 51 | +| [decision driver b] | --- | Good, because [argument b] | |
| 52 | +| [decision driver c] | -- | Bad, because [argument c] | |
| 53 | +| [decision driver d] | o | Neutral, because [argument d] | |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +### [option 2] |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | +[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional --> |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +| Decision Driver | Rating | Reason | |
| 60 | +|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------| |
| 61 | +| [decision driver a] | +++ | Good, because [argument a] | | |
| 62 | +| [decision driver b] | --- | Good, because [argument b] | |
| 63 | +| [decision driver c] | -- | Bad, because [argument c] | |
| 64 | +| [decision driver d] | o | Neutral, because [argument d] | |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +### [option 3] |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional --> |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | +| Decision Driver | Rating | Reason | |
| 71 | +|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------| |
| 72 | +| [decision driver a] | +++ | Good, because [argument a] | | |
| 73 | +| [decision driver b] | --- | Good, because [argument b] | |
| 74 | +| [decision driver c] | -- | Bad, because [argument c] | |
| 75 | +| [decision driver d] | o | Neutral, because [argument d] | |
| 76 | + |
| 77 | +## Related Decision Records <!-- optional --> |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | +[previous decision record, e.g., an ADR, which is solved by this one | next decision record, e.g., an ADR, which solves this one | … | pointer to more information] |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | +## Links <!-- optional --> |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | +- [Link type](link to adr) <!-- example: Refined by [xxx](yyyymmdd-xxx.md) --> |
| 84 | +- … <!-- numbers of links can vary --> |
0 commit comments