Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Battig and Montague Category Norms (1969) #1395

Open
alzkuc opened this issue Jul 2, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Battig and Montague Category Norms (1969) #1395

alzkuc opened this issue Jul 2, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@alzkuc
Copy link
Collaborator

alzkuc commented Jul 2, 2024

Citation: Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80(3, Pt.2), 1–46.

Features norms for 56 verbal categories (43 originally published in Cohen et al. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD0142729.pdf as Connecticut norms)

Procedure: Spontaneous naming (association) task; A participant was given a category and asked to name as many items as possible that belong to that semantic category in under 30s. Results include all responses, number of times each response was given, mean rank of each response, correlations between those measures, category potency rating (average rated frequency)

PDF accessible via: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1969-12939-001

Important: NOT Open-access

@alzkuc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

alzkuc commented Jul 2, 2024

@LinguList I do not think we can include these norms, as they are protected by APA - for some uses, one is not allowed to republish them at all, for including some of the tables on a website, they ask money

@alzkuc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

alzkuc commented Jul 2, 2024

@LinguList I do not think we can include these norms, as they are protected by APA - for some uses, one is not allowed to republish them at all, for including some of the tables on a website, they ask money

We can of course cite them, that is not a problem, I am just not sure what exact use would NoRaRe or including them in Conception be classified as.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants