|
| 1 | +NAME |
| 2 | + CorScorer: Perl package for scoring coreference resolution systems |
| 3 | + using different metrics. |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | +VERSION |
| 7 | + v7.0 -- reference implementations of MUC, B-cubed and CEAF metrics. |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +INSTALLATION |
| 11 | + Requirements: |
| 12 | + 1. Perl: downloadable from http://perl.org |
| 13 | + 2. Algorithm-Munkres: included in this package and downloadable |
| 14 | + from CPAN http://search.cpan.org/~tpederse/Algorithm-Munkres-0.08 |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +USE |
| 17 | + This package is distributed with two scripts to execute the scorer from |
| 18 | + the command line. |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | + Windows (tm): scorer.bat |
| 21 | + Linux: scorer.pl |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +SYNOPSIS |
| 25 | + use CorScorer; |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | + $metric = 'ceafm'; |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | + # Scores the whole dataset |
| 30 | + &CorScorer::Score($metric, $keys_file, $response_file); |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | + # Scores one file |
| 33 | + &CorScorer::Score($metric, $keys_file, $response_file, $name); |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +INPUT |
| 37 | + metric: the metric desired to score the results: |
| 38 | + muc: MUCScorer (Vilain et al, 1995) |
| 39 | + bcub: B-Cubed (Bagga and Baldwin, 1998) |
| 40 | + ceafm: CEAF (Luo et al, 2005) using mention-based similarity |
| 41 | + ceafe: CEAF (Luo et al, 2005) using entity-based similarity |
| 42 | + all: uses all the metrics to score |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | + keys_file: file with expected coreference chains in SemEval format |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | + response_file: file with output of coreference system (SemEval format) |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | + name: [optional] the name of the document to score. If name is not |
| 49 | + given, all the documents in the dataset will be scored. If given |
| 50 | + name is "none" then all the documents are scored but only total |
| 51 | + results are shown. |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +OUTPUT |
| 55 | + The score subroutine returns an array with four values in this order: |
| 56 | + 1) Recall numerator |
| 57 | + 2) Recall denominator |
| 58 | + 3) Precision numerator |
| 59 | + 4) Precision denominator |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | + Also recall, precision and F1 are printed in the standard output when variable |
| 62 | + $VERBOSE is not null. |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | + Final scores: |
| 65 | + Recall = recall_numerator / recall_denominator |
| 66 | + Precision = precision_numerator / precision_denominator |
| 67 | + F1 = 2 * Recall * Precision / (Recall + Precision) |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | + Identification of mentions |
| 70 | + An scorer for identification of mentions (recall, precision and F1) is also included. |
| 71 | + Mentions from system response are compared with key mentions. There are two kind of |
| 72 | + positive matching response mentions: |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | + a) Strictly correct identified mentions: Tokens included in response mention are exactly |
| 75 | + the same tokens included in key mention. |
| 76 | + |
| 77 | + b) Partially correct identified mentions: Response mention tokens include the head token |
| 78 | + of the key mention and no new tokens are added (i.e. the key mention bounds are not |
| 79 | + overcome). |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | + The partially correct mentions can be given some credit (for |
| 83 | + example, a weight of 0.5) to get a combined score as follows: |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | + Recall = (a + 0.5 * b) / #key mentions |
| 86 | + Precision = (a + 0.5 * b) / #response mentions |
| 87 | + F1 = 2 * Recall * Precision / (Recall + Precision) |
| 88 | + |
| 89 | + For the official CoNLL evaluation, however, we will only consider |
| 90 | + mentions with exact boundaries as being correct. |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | +SEE ALSO |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +1. http://stel.ub.edu/semeval2010-coref/ |
| 95 | + |
| 96 | +2. Marta Recasens, Lluís Màrquez, Emili Sapena, M. Antònia Martí, Mariona Taulé, |
| 97 | + Véronique Hoste, Massimo Poesio, and Yannick Versley. 2010. SemEval-2010 Task 1: |
| 98 | + Coreference Resolution in Multiple Languages. In Proceedings of the ACL International |
| 99 | + Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2010), pp. 1-8, Uppsala, Sweden. |
| 100 | + |
| 101 | + |
| 102 | +AUTHOR |
| 103 | + Emili Sapena, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya |
| 104 | + http://www.lsi.upc.edu/~esapena |
| 105 | + esapena <at> lsi.upc.edu |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | + |
| 108 | +COPYRIGHT AND LICENSE |
| 109 | + Copyright (C) 2009-2011, Emili Sapena esapena <at> lsi.upc.edu |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | + This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it |
| 112 | + under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the |
| 113 | + Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your |
| 114 | + option) any later version. This program is distributed in the hope that |
| 115 | + it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied |
| 116 | + warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the |
| 117 | + GNU General Public License for more details. |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | + You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along |
| 120 | + with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., |
| 121 | + 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. |
| 122 | + |
| 123 | + Modified in 2013 for v1.07 by Sebastian Martschat, |
| 124 | + sebastian.martschat <at> h-its.org |
0 commit comments