Implicit special member functions

[sdkrystian]

We need to decide whether to extract implicitly declared special member functions. On one hand, extracting such functions could introduce a lot of "noise" to the documentation (since most classes would have them). On the other hand, a class could for example contain a private non-copyable non-static data member, which would make the class non-copyable but not be apparent from the public interface.

[alandefreitas]

What does cppreference do? It seems reasonable to document them because they're part of the API. They're just 5 functions anyway, so it shouldn't be much noise in the documentation.